The marine Roseobacter group encompasses numerous species which occupy a large variety of ecological niches. However, members of the genus Phaeobacter are specifically adapted to a surface-associated lifestyle and have so far been found nearly exclusively in disjunct, man-made environments including shellfish and fish aquacultures, as well as harbors. Therefore, the possible natural habitats, dispersal and evolution of Phaeobacter spp. have largely remained obscure. Applying a high-throughput cultivation strategy along a longitudinal Pacific transect, the present study revealed for the first time a widespread natural occurrence of Phaeobacter in the marine pelagial. These bacteria were found to be specifically associated to mesoplankton where they constitute a small but detectable proportion of the bacterial community. The 16S rRNA gene sequences of 18 isolated strains were identical to that of Phaeobacter gallaeciensis DSM26640T but sequences of internal transcribed spacer and selected genomes revealed that the strains form a distinct clade within P. gallaeciensis. The genomes of the Pacific and the aquaculture strains were highly conserved and had a fraction of the core genome of 89.6%, 80 synteny breakpoints, and differed 2.2% in their nucleotide sequences. Diversification likely occurred through neutral mutations. However, the Pacific strains exclusively contained two active Type I restriction modification systems which is commensurate with a reduced acquisition of mobile elements in the Pacific clade. The Pacific clade of P. gallaeciensis also acquired a second, homolog phosphonate transport system compared to all other P. gallaeciensis. Our data indicate that a previously unknown, distinct clade of P. gallaeciensis acquired a limited number of clade-specific genes that were relevant for its association with mesozooplankton and for colonization of the marine pelagial. The divergence of the Pacific clade most likely was driven by the adaptation to this novel ecological niche rather than by geographic isolation.

Microbiological and biomolecular approaches to cultural heritage research have expanded the established research horizon, from the prevalent focus on the conservation of the cultural objects and the protection of human health, to the relatively recent applications to provenance inquiry and assessment of environmental impacts on heritage objects in a global context of a changing climate. Standard microbiology and molecular biology methods were developed for other materials, specimens, disciplines and contexts. Although they could in principle be applied to cultural heritage research, certain characteristics common to several heritage objects, such as uniqueness, fragility, high value and restricted access, demand tailored approaches. In addition, samples from heritage objects often yield low microbial biomass, rendering them highly susceptible to cross-contamination. Therefore, dedicated methodology that addresses these material limitations and operational hurdles along all procedural steps are needed. Here were propose a step-by-step standardized laboratory and bioinformatic workflow to analyse the microbiome of cultural heritage objects. The methodology was developed targeting the challenging side of the spectrum of cultural heritage objects, such as the delicate written record, while retaining modularity and flexibility to adapt and/or upscale the proposed workflow to heritage artefacts of a more robust nature or larger dimensions. We hope this review and workflow will facilitate the interdisciplinary inquiry and interactions among the cultural heritage research community.

A novel Gram-negative, aerobic, motile, rod-shaped, beige-pigmented bacterium, strain ARW1-2F2T, was isolated from a seawater sample collected from Roscoff, France. Strain ARW1-2F2T was catalase-negative and oxidase-positive, and grew under mesophilic, neutrophilic and halophilic conditions. The 16S rRNA sequences revealed that strain ARW1-2F2T was closely related to Arcobacter lekithochrous LFT 1.7T and Arcobacter caeni RW17-10T(95.8 and 95.5 % gene sequence similarity, respectively). The genome of strain ARW1-2F2T was sequenced and had a G+C content of 28.7%. Two different measures of genome similarity, average nucleotide identity based on blast and digital DNA–DNA hybridization, indicated that strain ARW1-2F2T represents a new Arcobacter species. The predominant fatty acids were C16 : 1 ω7c/C16 : 1 ω6c and C18 : 1 ω7c/C18 : 1 ω6c. The results of a polyphasic analysis supported the description of strain ARW1-2F2T as representing a novel species of the genus Arcobacter , for which the name Arcobacter roscoffensis sp. nov. is proposed with the type strain ARW1-2F2T (DSM 29169T=KCTC 52423T).

Microbiological and biomolecular approaches to cultural heritage research have expanded the established research horizon from the prevalent focus on the cultural objects' conservation and human health protection to the relatively recent applications to provenance inquiry and assessment of environmental impacts in a global context of a changing climate. Standard microbiology and molecular biology methods developed for other materials, specimens, and contexts could, in principle, be applied to cultural heritage research. However, given certain characteristics common to several heritage objects—such as uniqueness, fragility, high value, and restricted access, tailored approaches are required. In addition, samples of heritage objects may yield low microbial biomass, rendering them highly susceptible to cross-contamination. Therefore, dedicated methodology addressing these limitations and operational hurdles is needed. Here, we review the main experimental challenges and propose a standardized workflow to study the microbiome of cultural heritage objects, illustrated by the exploration of bacterial taxa. The methodology was developed targeting the challenging side of the spectrum of cultural heritage objects, such as the delicate written record, while retaining flexibility to adapt and/or upscale it to heritage artifacts of a more robust constitution or larger dimensions. We hope this tailored review and workflow will facilitate the interdisciplinary inquiry and interactions among the cultural heritage research community.