The halal of a product as proven by a halal certificate is very important in providing legal guarantees and protection to Muslim consumers, especially in consuming products on the market. On this basis, this study aims to discuss the types of products that require halal certificates, the mechanism for issuing halal certificates and legal sanctions for business actors whose products are not halal certified according to Law Number 33 of 2014. This research uses normative legal research, namely research on secondary data in the form of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials that are relevant to the subject matter. These legal materials were collected through library studies. Then the legal materials are processed and analyzed descriptively qualitatively. The results of the study indicate that products that are required to have a halal certificate are products that enter, circulate and are traded in Indonesia. Then products that come from halal ingredients and meet PPH. Halal certificates are issued by BPJPH based on the MUI fatwa at the request of business actors whose products are required to be certified halal. Business actors who do not maintain the halal of their products are subject to imprisonment or fines.

The criminal responsibility system for the crime of prostitution in Indonesia is partial and discriminatory. There is no guarantee of legal certainty and a legal vacuum for Commercial Sex Workers and their service users. This study aims to analyze and find the criminal responsibility system for prostitution according to positive criminal law in Indonesia and the weaknesses of the criminal responsibility system for prostitution based on the value of Pancasila justice. The paradigm in this research is post-positivism, which aims to produce new thoughts, understandings or ideas and theories in Indonesia's material criminal law system. The method of normative juridical approach, with secondary data sources obtained through literature studies both on primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials, the data were then analyzed by qualitative descriptive methods. The study results show that the construction of positive criminal law in the Indonesian Criminal Code and the Electronic Information and Transaction Law (UU ITE) cannot be used to impose criminal liability on all parties involved in this crime. The provisions are partial and discriminatory. Weaknesses can be seen from the aspect of substance, structure, and culture so that the ideal reconstruction of the policy is needed to reconstruct Article 296 and Article 506 of the Criminal Code as well as Article 27 paragraph (1) and Article 45 paragraph (1) of the ITE Law which is based on non-discrimination and equality before the law that comes from extracting living values, In society.