A survey was initiated to determine the prevalence of Salmonella enterica in the environment in and around Monterey County, CA, a major agriculture region of the United States. Trypticase soy broth enrichment cultures of samples of soil/sediment (n ‫؍‬ 617), water (n ‫؍‬ 252), wildlife (n ‫؍‬ 476), cattle feces (n ‫؍‬ 795), and preharvest lettuce and spinach (n ‫؍‬ 261) tested originally for the presence of pathogenic Escherichia coli were kept in frozen storage and later used to test for the presence of S. enterica. A multipathogen oligonucleotide microarray was employed to identify a subset of samples that might contain Salmonella in order to test various culture methods to survey a larger number of samples. Fifty-five of 2,401 (2.3%) samples yielded Salmonella, representing samples obtained from 20 different locations in Monterey and San Benito Counties. Water had the highest percentage of positives (7.1%) among sample types. Wildlife yielded 20 positive samples, the highest number among sample types, with positive samples from birds (n ‫؍‬ 105), coyotes (n ‫؍‬ 40), deer (n ‫؍‬ 104), elk (n ‫؍‬ 39), wild pig (n ‫؍‬ 41), and skunk (n ‫؍‬ 13). Only 16 (2.6%) of the soil/sediment samples tested positive, and none of the produce samples had detectable Salmonella. Sixteen different serotypes were identified among the isolates, including S. enterica serotypes Give, Typhimurium, Montevideo, and Infantis. Fifty-four strains were sensitive to 12 tested antibiotics; one S. Montevideo strain was resistant to streptomycin and gentamicin. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis of the isolates revealed over 40 different pulsotypes. Several strains were isolated from water, wildlife, or soil over a period of several months, suggesting that they were persistent in this environment.

BackgroundIn the U.S., tomatoes have become the most implicated vehicle for produce-associated Salmonellosis with 12 outbreaks since 1998. Although unconfirmed, trace backs suggest pre-harvest contamination with Salmonella enterica. Routes of tomato crop contamination by S. enterica in the absence of direct artificial inoculation have not been investigated.Methodology/Principal FindingsThis work examined the role of contaminated soil, the potential for crop debris to act as inoculum from one crop to the next, and any interaction between the seedbourne plant pathogen Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria and S. enterica on tomato plants. Our results show S. enterica can survive for up to six weeks in fallow soil with the ability to contaminate tomato plants. We found S. enterica can contaminate a subsequent crop via crop debris; however a fallow period between crop incorporation and subsequent seeding can affect contamination patterns. Throughout these studies, populations of S. enterica declined over time and there was no bacterial growth in either the phyllosphere or rhizoplane. The presence of X. campestris pv. vesicatoria on co-colonized tomato plants had no effect on the incidence of S. enterica tomato phyllosphere contamination. However, growth of S. enterica in the tomato phyllosphere occurred on co-colonized plants in the absence of plant disease.Conclusions/Significance S. enterica contaminated soil can lead to contamination of the tomato phyllosphere. A six week lag period between soil contamination and tomato seeding did not deter subsequent crop contamination. In the absence of plant disease, presence of the bacterial plant pathogen, X. campestris pv. vesicatoria was beneficial to S. enterica allowing multiplication of the human pathogen population. Any event leading to soil contamination with S. enterica could pose a public health risk with subsequent tomato production, especially in areas prone to bacterial spot disease.

Incidences of bacterial foodborne illness caused by ingestion of fresh produce are rising. Instead of this being due to incidental contamination, the animal pathogen Salmonella enterica utilizes specific molecular mechanisms to attach to and colonize plants. This work characterizes two S. enterica genes of unknown function: a putative periplasmic protein, STM0278, and a putative protein with a hydrolase in the C-terminus, STM0650. STM0278 and STM0650 are important for seedling colonization but appear to have different roles during the process of colonization. Mutants of either STM0278 or STM0650 showed reduced colonization of alfalfa seedlings at 24 h, and the STM0278 mutant also showed reduced colonization at 48 h. Both genes were expressed in planta at 4 h following inoculation of 3-day-old seedlings and at 72 h after seed inoculation. This suggests that the role of STM0650 in seedling colonization is less important later in the process or is duplicated by other mechanisms. Mutants of STM0278 and STM0650 were defective in swarming. The STM0278 mutant failed to swarm in 24 h, while swarming of the STM0650 mutant was delayed. Addition of surfactant restored swarming of the STM0278 mutant, suggesting that STM0278 is involved in surfactant or osmotic agent production or deployment. Alfalfa seed exudates as the sole nutrient source were capable of perpetuating S. enterica swarming. Sequence analysis revealed sequences homologous to STM0278 and STM0650 in plant-associated bacteria, but none in Escherichia coli. Phylogenetic analysis of STM0650 showed similar sequences from diverse classes of plant-associated bacteria. Bacteria that preferentially colonize roots, including S. enterica, may use a similar hydrolase for swarming or biofilm production on plants. Multicellular behaviours by S. enterica appear central to plant colonization. S. enterica genes involved in plant colonization and survival outside of a host are most likely among the 'function unknown' genes of this bacterium.