Evidence-based standardization of the perioperative management of patients undergoing complex spine surgery can improve outcomes such as enhanced patient satisfaction, reduced intensive care and hospital length of stay, and reduced costs. The Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care (SNACC) tasked an expert group to review existing evidence and generate recommendations for the perioperative management of patients undergoing complex spine surgery, defined as surgery on 2 or more thoracic and/or lumbar spine levels. Institutional clinical management protocols can be constructed based on the elements included in these clinical practice guidelines, and the evidence presented.

BACKGROUND:Blood-based balanced resuscitation is a standard of care in massively bleeding trauma patients. No data exist as to when this therapy no longer significantly affects mortality. We sought to determine if there is a threshold beyond which further massive transfusion will not affect in-hospital mortality. METHODS:The Trauma Quality Improvement database was queried for all adult patients registered between 2013 and 2017 who received at least one unit of blood (packed red blood cell) within 4 hours of arrival. In-hospital mortality was evaluated based on the total transfusion volume (TTV) at 4 hours and 24 hours in the overall cohort (OC) and in a balanced transfusion cohort, composed of patients who received transfusion at a ratio of 1:1 to 2:1 packed red blood cell to plasma. A bootstrapping method in combination with multivariable Poisson regression was used to find a cutoff after which additional transfusion no longer affected in-hospital mortality. Multivariable Poisson regression was used to control for age, sex, race, highest Abbreviated Injury Scale score in each body region, comorbidities, advanced directives limiting care, and the primary surgery performed for hemorrhage control. RESULTS:The OC consisted of 99,042 patients, of which 28,891 and 30,768 received a balanced transfusion during the first 4 hours and 24 hours, respectively. The mortality rate plateaued after a TTVof 40.5 units (95% confidence interval [CI], 40-41) in the OC at 4 hours and after a TTV of 52.8 units (95% CI, 52-53) at 24 hours following admission. In the balanced transfusion cohort, mortality plateaued at a TTV of 39 units (95% CI, 39-39) and 53 units (95% CI, 53-53) at 4 hours and 24 hours following admission, respectively. CONCLUSION:Transfusion thresholds exist beyond which ongoing transfusion is not associated with any clinically significant change in mortality. These TTVs can be used as markers for resuscitation timeouts to assess the plan of care moving forward.

No abstract

Introduction: Pregnant trauma patients are an underdescribed cohort in the medical literature. Noting injury patterns and contributors to mortality may lead to improved care. Methods: Female patients between 14 and 49 years of age were identified among entries in the 2017 National Trauma Data Bank. Data points were compared using Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, Student's t-test, Mann–Whitney rank-sum, or multiple logistic regression as appropriate. P < 0.05 was used to determine the findings of significance. Results: There were 569 pregnant trauma patients identified, which was 0.54% of the 105,507 women identified. Overall, mortality was low among all women and not different between groups (1.2% for pregnant women vs. 2.2% for nonpregnant, P = 0.12). Pregnant women with head injuries had a higher mortality rate than pregnant women without (4.2% vs. 0.47%, P < 0.01). Head injuries (Abbreviated Injury Severity Score [AIS] head >1) were associated with an increased risk for mortality (odds ratio: 3.33, 95% confidence interval: 3.0–3.7, P < 0.01). Conclusion: There was no increase in mortality for trauma patients who are pregnant when controlling for covariates. Factors such as head injuries, the need for blood, and comorbid diseases appear to have a more significant contribution to mortality. We also report the prevalence of head, cervical spine, and extremity injuries in pregnant trauma patients. Multidisciplinary simulation, jointly crafted protocols, and expanding training in regional anesthesia may be the next steps to improving care for pregnant trauma patients.

Background: An external ventricular drain (EVD) training module may improve the knowledge and proficiency of perioperative health care providers (HCPs). Methods: We examined knowledge gaps, self-reported comfort in managing EVDs, and improvement in self-assessment scores among HCPs from 7 academic medical centers based on an online EVD training module. Results: Of the 326 HCPs who completed the module, 207 (70.6%) reported being uncomfortable managing EVDs. The median pretest scores were 6 (interquartile range=2), and posttest scores were 8 (interquartile range=1), out of a maximum possible score of 9. The most frequent incorrectly answered questions were: (a) maximum allowed hourly cerebrospinal fluid volume drainage (51%), (b) the components of a normal intracranial pressure waveform (41%), and (c) identifying the correct position of the stopcock for accurate measurement of intracranial pressure (41%). The overall gain in scores was 2 (interquartile range=2) and highest among HCPs who had managed 1 to 25 EVDs (2.51, 95% confidence interval: 2.23-2.80), and without self-reported comfort in managing EVDs (2.26, 95% confidence interval: 1.96-2.33, P<0.0001). The majority of participants (312, 95.7%) reported that the training module helped them understand how to manage EVDs, and 276 (84.7%) rated the module 8 or more out of 10 in recommending it to their colleagues. Conclusions: This online EVD training module was well-received by participants. Overall, improved scores reflect enhanced knowledge among HCPs following completion of the module. The greatest benefit was observed in those reporting less experience and feeling uncomfortable in managing EVDs. The impact on the reduction in EVD-associated adverse events deserves further examination.