Introduction: Pulsatile extracorporeal circulation may improve organ perfusion during cardiac surgery. Some minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation (MiECC) systems allow pulsatile perfusion. The present study investigated the influence of arterial tubing compliance on hemodynamic energy transfer into the patient. Methods: Aortic models with adult human geometry were perfused in a mock circulation. A MiECC system was connected using either high-compliance silicone tubing or standard kit tubing. Energy equivalent pressure (EEP) and surplus hemodynamic energy (SHE) were computed from flow and pressure data. Aortic models with physiological and sub-physiological compliance were tested to assess the influence of the pseudo-patient. Results: Non-pulsatile flow did not generate SHE. SHE during pulsatile flow in the compliant aortic model was significantly higher with kit tubing compared to silicone tubing. Maximum SHE was achieved at 1.6 L/min with kit tubing (7.7% of mean arterial pressure) and with silicone tubing (4.9%). Using the low-compliance aortic model, SHE with kit tubing reached a higher maximum of 14.2% at 1.8 L/min compared to silicone tubing (11.8% at 1.5 L/min). Conclusions: Flexible arterial tubing did not preserve more hemodynamic energy from a pulsatile pump compared to standard kit tubing in a model of adult extracorporeal circulation. The pseudo-patient’s compliance significantly affected the properties of the mock circulation.

Background: Pulsatile extracorporeal circulation (ECC) may improve perfusion of critical organs during cardiac surgery. This study analyzed the influence of the components of a minimal invasive ECC (MiECC) on the transfer of pulsatile energy into the pseudo-patient of a mock circulation.Methods: An aortic model with human-like geometry and compliance was perfused by a diagonal pump. Surplus hemodynamic energy (SHE) was determined from flow and pressure data. Five adult-size oxygenator models and three sizes of cannulas were compared. Pulsatile pump settings were optimized, and parallel dual-pump configurations were evaluated. Results:Oxygenator models showed up to twofold differences in pressure gradients and influenced SHE at flow rates up to 2.0 L min −1 . Adjustments of frequency, systole duration, and rotational speed gain significantly improved SHE compared with empirical settings, with SHE above 21% of mean arterial pressure at flow rates of 1.0 L min −1 to 1.5 L min −1 and SHE above 5% at 3.5 L min −1 . Small diameter cannula (15 Fr) limited SHE compared with larger cannula (21 Fr and 23 Fr). Two diagonal pumps did not provide higher SHE than a single pump, but permitted additional control over pulse pressure and SHE by varying the total fraction of pulsatile flow and the fraction of flow bypassing the oxygenator. Conclusions: Proper selection of components and optimizations of pump settings significantly improved pulse pressure and SHE of pulsatile MiECC.Surplus hemodynamic energy depended on flow rate with a maximum at 1.0 L min −1 -1.5 L min −1 . Pulsatile MiECC may specifically assist organ perfusion during phases of low flow.

No abstract