No abstract

y people to ensure healthy pregnancies. Yet, the right to give birth safely with dignity is not consistently protected for pregnant people behind bars (Hayes et al., 2020). Previous studies and lawsuits have documented the variable and inadequate care for pregnant people in custody (Peeler et ObjectivesNearly 4% of incarcerated women in the United States (US) are pregnant when incarcerated (Sufrin et al., 2019). Thus, carceral facilities are tasked with caring for pregnant

Objective: To estimate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mortality rates among individuals incarcerated in U.S. state prisons by race and ethnicity (RE). Design: Retrospective population-based analysis Setting: Data from state-level Departments of Corrections (DOCs) from March 1 through October 1, 2020. Participants: Publicly available data collected by Freedom of Information Act requests representing adults in the custody of US state DOCs. Main Outcomes: Cumulative COVID-19 death and custody population data. Crude RE-specific cumulative death rates per 1,000 persons, by state and in aggregate, using RE-specific custody population on March 1, 2020, as the denominator. Rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) compared state-level and aggregate cumulative age-adjusted mortality rates as of 10/01/2020 by RE, with White individuals as reference group. Results: Of all COVID-related deaths in U.S. prisons through October 2020, 23.35% (272 of 1165) were captured in our analyses. The average age at COVID-19 mortality was 63 years (SD=10 years) and was significantly lower among Black (60 years, SD=11 years) compared to White adults (66 years, SD=10 years; p<0.001). In age-standardized analysis, COVID-19 mortality rates were significantly higher among Black (RR=1.93, 95% CI: 1.25-2.99), Hispanic (RR=1.81, 95% CI: 1.10-2.96) and those of Other racial and ethnic groups (RR=2.60, 95% CI: 1.01-6.67) when compared to White individuals. Conclusions: Age-standardized mortality rates were higher among incarcerated Black, Hispanic and those of Other RE groups compared to their White counterparts. Greater data transparency from all carceral systems is needed to better understand populations at disproportionate risk of COVID-19 morbidity and mortality.

Objectives: We aimed to describe conditions of confinement among people incarcerated in the United States during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic using a community-science data collection approach. Methods: We developed a web-based survey with community partners to collect information on confinement conditions (COVID-19 safety, basic needs, support). Formerly incarcerated adults released after March 1, 2020, or nonincarcerated adults in communication with an incarcerated person (proxy) were recruited through social media from July 25, 2020 to March 27, 2021. Descriptive statistics were estimated in aggregate and separately by proxy or formerly incarcerated status. Responses between proxy and formerly incarcerated respondents were compared using Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests based on α=0.05. Results: Of 378 responses, 94% were by proxy, and 76% reflected state prison conditions. Participants reported inability to physically distance (≥6 ft at all times; 92%), inadequate access to soap (89%), water (46%), toilet paper (49%), and showers (68%) for incarcerated people. Among those receiving prepandemic mental health care, 75% reported reduced care for incarcerated people. Responses were consistent between formerly incarcerated and proxy respondents, although responses by formerly incarcerated people were limited. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that a web-based community-science data collection approach through nonincarcerated community members is feasible; however, recruitment of recently released individuals may require additional resources. Our data obtained primarily through individuals in communication with an incarcerated person suggest COVID-19 safety and basic needs were not sufficiently addressed within some carceral settings in 2020–2021. The perspectives of incarcerated individuals should be leveraged in assessing crisis–response strategies.