Purpose: One mechanism of tumor resistance to cytotoxic therapy is repair of damaged DNA.Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)-1is a nuclear enzyme involved in base excision repair, one of the five major repair pathways. PARP inhibitors are emerging as a new class of agents that can potentiate chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The article reports safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic results of the first-in-class trial of a PARP inhibitor, AG014699, combined with temozolomide in adults with advanced malignancy. Experimental Design: Initially, patients with solid tumors received escalating doses of AG014699 with 100 mg/m 2 /d temozolomide  5 every 28 days to establish the PARP inhibitory dose (PID). Subsequently, AG014699 dose was fixed at PID and temozolomide escalated to maximum tolerated dose or 200 mg/m 2 in metastatic melanoma patients whose tumors were biopsied. AG014699 and temozolomide pharmacokinetics, PARP activity, DNA strand single-strand breaks, response, and toxicity were evaluated. Results: Thirty-three patients were enrolled. PARP inhibition was seen at all doses; PID was 12 mg/m 2 based on 74% to 97% inhibition of peripheral blood lymphocyte PARP activity. Recommended doses were 12 mg/m 2 AG014699 and 200 mg/m 2 temozolomide. Mean tumor PARP inhibition at 5 h was 92% (range, 46-97%). No toxicity attributable to AG014699 alone was observed. AG014699 showed linear pharmacokinetics with no interaction with temozolomide. All patients treated at PID showed increases in DNA single-strand breaks and encouraging evidence of activity was seen. Conclusions: The combination of AG014699 and temozolomide is well tolerated, pharmacodynamic assessments showing proof of principle of the mode of action of this new class of agents.Multiple pathways contribute to the repair of damaged DNA (1). Defects in these pathways are a cause of cancer susceptibility (2, 3), but, when intact, their activity is a factor in tumor resistance to widely used DNA-damaging cancer treatments (e.g., cytotoxic drugs and ionizing radiation; ref. 4). Several novel agents are being developed which target DNA repair in an attempt to improve cancer treatment (5), including agents that may exploit tumor DNA repair defects (e.g., BRCA1 and BRCA2) by inducing ''synthetic lethality'' (6, 7).Base excision repair is a complex process that repairs DNA single-strand breaks caused by endogenous reactive species and anticancer agents (8). Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP) is a key enzyme in this pathway, binding to and being activated by the DNA break, effectively acting as a molecular nick sensor (9), and recruiting additional repair factors. Preclinical evidence has shown that inhibiting PARP potentiates cytotoxics, particularly alkylating agents and topoisomerase I inhibitors, and radiotherapy (10 -12). Several PARP

Fas and TNF-R1 are cysteine-rich cell surface receptors related to the low-affinity nerve growth factor receptor family. Engagement of these receptors by their respective ligands, FasL and tumor necrosis factor, leads to apoptosis that is signaled through a conserved intracellular portion of the receptor termed the ''death domain.'' We have cloned a new member of this family, lymphocyte-associated receptor of death (LARD), which leads to spontaneous apoptosis when expressed in 293T cells. The expression of LARD is more tightly regulated than that of either Fas or TNF-R1 as it is found predominantly on lymphocytes (T and B cells) but not on macrophages or a number of transformed lymphocyte cell lines. Alternative pre-mRNA splicing generates at least 11 distinct isoforms of LARD. The full-length isoform, LARD-1, extends to include the transmembrane and death domains, whereas the other isoforms encode potentially secreted molecules. Naive B and T cells express very little LARD-1 but express combinations of the other isoforms. Upon T cell activation, a programmed change in alternative splicing occurs so that the full-length, membrane-bound LARD-1 predominates. This may have implications for the control of lymphocyte proliferation following activation.

PARP1 regulates the repair of DNA single-strand breaks generated directly, or during base excision repair (BER). However, the role of PARP2 in these and other repair mechanisms is unknown. Here, we report a requirement for PARP2 in stabilising replication forks that encounter BER intermediates through Fbh1-dependent regulation of Rad51. Whereas PARP2 is dispensable for tolerance of cells to SSBs or homologous recombination dysfunction, it is redundant with PARP1 in BER. Therefore, combined disruption of PARP1 and PARP2 leads to defective BER, resulting in elevated levels of replication-associated DNA damage owing to an inability to stabilise Rad51 at damaged replication forks and prevent uncontrolled DNA resection. Together, our results demonstrate how PARP1 and PARP2 regulate two independent, but intrinsically linked aspects of DNA base damage tolerance by promoting BER directly, and by stabilising replication forks that encounter BER intermediates.