No abstract

The key comparison CCQM-K18 was started in order to evaluate the equivalence of metrology institutes as a follow-up of the previous study CCQM-P52. As a sample a carbonate buffer solution was used with a composition slightly different to the usual one. There were 13 institutes participating in the comparison using a primary method for pH measurement. The fair agreement between the results reflects increased difficulty in measurement, where the buffer composition may slightly change during the measurement and extrapolation to the start time of measurement is usually necessary.Main text. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA).

Results of the CCQM-K91 key comparison on pH of an unknown phthalate buffer with a nominal pH value of pH ~ 4.01 at 25 °C are reported. Measurements are performed at 15 °C, 25 °C and 37 °C and optional also at 5 °C and 50 °C.Main text. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

The subsequent key comparison CCQM-K18.1 was started in order to evaluate the equivalence of metrology institutes as a follow-up to the previous key comparison CCQM-K18 for institutes that could not take part in the comparison at that time or did not consider their results representative of their capabilities. A carbonate buffer of a slightly different composition to that in CCQM-K18 was used.There were seven institutes plus the coordinating laboratory participating in this subsequent comparison. Most of the participating institutes showed significant improvement; in some cases the new results confirmed the previous ones. The reasons for this have still to be elucidated. Main text. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA).