No abstract

Introduction Insufficient blood supply to the posterior rectal remnant after proctectomy is a possible mechanism for anastomotic leakage. The median sacral artery (MSA) is not generally considered to participate in the rectal blood supply, although some case studies have reported the rectum being supplied by it. The aim of this study is to elucidate the anatomy of the MSA in relation to the posterior rectal wall. Methods Nineteen embalmed cadavers (12 males, seven females; mean age: 76 ± 9 years) were injected with a colored radio‐opaque mixture in the aortic bifurcation, radiographed and subsequently dissected along the sacrum. The relationship between the MSA and the rectum was observed and the diameter of the MSA was measured 2 cm below the aortic bifurcation. Results MSAs were identified in 16 (84.2%) of the 19 cadavers. Nine MSAs (47.4%) reached the rectal wall and penetrated it. MSAs that reached the posterior rectum took two different routes in the presacral space. Dissection and radiography showed four penetrating MSAs (21.1%) ending in a branching pattern and five (26.3%) as a tapering vessel. Seven MSAs (36.8%) did not reach the rectal wall. The mean MSA diameter was 1.98 ± 0.12 mm. Conclusions Almost half the MSAs reached and penetrated the posterior rectal wall, suggesting possible participation in the rectal blood supply. A large portion of the MSAs that penetrate the rectal wall run outside surgical margins and could continue to provide blood supply to the rectal remnant, potentially preventing anastomotic leakage.

Introduction Surgical treatment of kidney cancer with a tumor thrombus spreading through the inferior vena cava (IVC) up to the right atrium remains a challenge. The aim of this article was to 1. assess the safety and feasibility of four transdiaphragmatic surgical approaches to the right atrium from the abdominal cavity; 2. to evaluate the feasibility of palpation and displacement of thrombi below the diaphragm. Material and methods Four cadaveric specimens preserved with the Thiel method to assess each surgical access: 1) extrapericardial T-shaped diaphragmotomy, 2) extrapericardial T-shaped + circular diaphragmotomy, 3) transpericardial T-shaped diaphragmotomy with longitudinal pericardiotomy, 4) transpericardial T-shaped + circular diaphragmotomy with longitudinal and circular pericardiotomy. Different diameters and density of tumor thrombus simulators, placed at various levels from the cava-diaphragm junction, were used to evaluate the palpation and displacement of the thrombus. Two surgeons performed each assessment independently. Results Approaches 2, 3 and 4 were significantly better than approach 1, regarding the feasibility of palpation, according to both surgeons (surgeon 1 Chi-square 21.56, p = 0.001; surgeon 2 Chi-square 27.83, p <0.0001). Approach 1 also showed a significant higher number of impossible displacements recorded by both surgeons (surgeon 1 Chi-square 19.02, p = 0.004; surgeon 2 Chi-square 20.01, p = 0.003). Only surgeon 1 recorded a significant lower number of easy palpations at 4 cm from the cava-diaphragm junction (Chi-square 14.10, p = 0.007). There were no high-risk complications in any approach. Conclusions The transdiaphragmatic access to the right atrium from the abdominal cavity is feasible using three of the four surgical approaches. They are an adequate alternative to sternotomy.

No abstract