SummaryHypothesis: This study was undertaken to determine whether echo-derived left atrial dimension and other echocardiographic, clinical, and hemodynamic parmeters detected at the time of entry into the study may influence prognosis in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy during a long-term follow-up.M(>thod.s: This was a prospective cohort analysis of 123 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Clinical evaluation, chest x-ray, M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiogram, exercise test, 72-h ambulatory electrocardiogram monitoring, and cardiac catheterization study were performed in all patients. The study was divided into two phases: in the first phase, patients were divided into two groups according to the left atrial size (24.5 mm; <45 mm), with cardiac death as the end point. In the second phase, all patients were further divided into two groups according to their clinical course. A multivariate analysis was performed to determine independent correlated parameters of cardiac mortality and overall clinical outcome.Results: Cardiac mortality rate was 47.9%: 29% in the group without left atrial dilation and 54.3% in the group with dilated left atrium. Multivariate analysis revealed that left atrium 245 mm, New York Heart Association functional classes IIIAV, and the presence of one or more episodes of ventricular tachycardia at Holter monitoring were independent predicton of cardiac mortality, while left atrium 245 mm, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure >17 mmHg, and exercise tolerance I IS min were independent predictors of poor clinical outcome.Conclusions: Our results revealed that left atrial size is the principal independent predictor of prognosis in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy in that patients with left atrial dilation had an increase in mortality and a worse clinical outcome compared with those without left atrial dilation.
We investigated the effects of transdermal 17beta-estradiol, combined with standard antihypertensive therapy, on the modification of the cardiovascular risk profile in hypertensive postmenopausal women. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we enrolled 200 postmenopausal women with mild to moderate hypertension. Patients received 17beta-estradiol (50 microg/day, transdermal) and norethisterone acetate (2.5 mg/ day, orally) or placebo. At baseline serum total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose, and fibrinogen plasma levels were measured and all subjects underwent complete M-mode and 2-D echocardiograms, which were repeated after 6, 12, and 18 months of hormonal replacement therapy. Compared with placebo, all values decreased significantly except for HDL cholesterol. In both groups, no modifications were observed in echocardiographic parameters, except for left ventricular mean diastolic and systolic wall thickness and left ventricular mass index, which showed a significant decrease in both groups. The reduction was greater in the treated group; the percentage of patients with left ventricular hypertrophy was 46% before randomization and 17.2% after 18 months of treatment (P < .0001), whereas in group II the percentage was 48% at baseline and 31.5% after 18 months (P < .05). In conclusion, transdermal 17beta-estradiol, associated with antihypertensive therapy, may contribute to the reduction of cardiovascular risk profile in hypertensive postmenopausal women.
It is well known that the restoration of sinus rhythm is not always associated with the return of effective atrial contraction. Atrial ejection force (AEF) is a noninvasive Doppler derived parameter that measures the strength of the atrial contraction. The aim of the present study was to use pulsed-Doppler echocardiography to determine if different modalities of cardioversion influence the delay in the return of effective atrial contraction after cardioversion. DC shock and pharmacological therapy were compared. Sixty-eight patients were randomly cardioverted, either using DC shock or i.v. procainamide. The patients who were restored to a sinus rhythm had a complete Doppler echocardiographic examination within 1 hour after the restoration, after 24 hours, after 1 month, and after 3 months. AEF was measured and compared in the two groups of patients and within the same group. AEF was greater immediately and at 24 hours after cardioversion in patients who underwent pharmacological therapy compared to patients treated with DC shock (peak A wave, 60 +/- 9 vs 31 +/- 8 msec, P < 0.001; AEF 11.3 +/- 3 vs 5 +/- 2.9 dynes, P < 0.001). In both groups, AEF increases over time. In conclusion, AEF is a noninvasive parameter that can be easily measured after cardioversion and can give accurate information about the recovery of left atrial mechanical function. This finding may have important implications for guiding the anticoagulant therapy after cardioversion.
SummaryBackground: The incidence of an inferior left ventricular infarction involving the right ventricle is very high, ranging from 14 to 84%. Isolated right ventricular infarction accounts for
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.