Background: LC has been associated with hyporesponsiveness to several vaccines. Nonetheless, no data on complete serological and B- and T-cell immune response are currently available. Aims: To assess, in comparison with healthy controls of the same age and gender, both humoral and cellular immunoresponses of patients with LC after two or three doses of the mRNA Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 and to investigate clinical features associated with non-response. Material and methods: 179 patients with LC of CTP class A in 93.3% and viral etiology in 70.1% of cases were longitudinally evaluated starting from the day before the first dose to 4 weeks after the booster dose. Their antibody responses were compared to those of healthcare workers without co-morbidities. In a subgroup of 40 patients, B- and T-cell responses were also compared to controls. Results: At d31, d90 and d180 after BNT162b2 vaccine, no detectable SARS-CoV-2 IgG response was observed in 5.9%, 3.9% and 7.2% of LC patients as compared to 0 controls (p < 0.03). A delay in B-cell and lack of prompt T-cell response compared to healthcare workers was also registered. A significant correlation between antibody titers and cellular response was observed. A MELD score > 8 was the only independent predictor of poor d31 response (p = 0.028). Conclusions: Our results suggest that cirrhotic patients have a slower and in <10% suboptimal immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Rates of breakthrough infections were comparable between cirrhotics and controls. The booster dose was critical in inducing both humoral and cellular responses comparable to controls.

Background and aim: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) may progress to severe liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. A limited number of studies with a long follow up assessed fibrosis progression and related predictors in untreated patients with a histological diagnosis of NAFLD. This study aims to investigate rate and predictors of NAFLD progression. Methods: For 9 (2–16.7) years, we followed up a cohort of patients histologically diagnosed. Disease progression was defined by a composite endpoint as evidence of cirrhosis in patients without cirrhosis at baseline, evidence of de novo occurrence of cirrhosis complications, histologically established worsening of stage 1 of fibrosis or increase of 20% in liver stiffness by transient elastography in patients rejecting a second liver biopsy. Results: A total of 91 patients were enrolled. Of them, 31 had NAFL and 60 NASH. A second liver biopsy was performed in 22 NASH patients and in 4 NAFL. Disease progression was observed in 38.5% NASH and in 12.0% NAFL (p = 0.034). Patients with portal inflammation had a higher risk of progression (66.7% vs 26%, p = 0.021). High triglycerides levels, advanced fibrosis at baseline and the duration of follow-up predict disease progression (p = 0.021; OR = 6.93, 95% CI 1.33–36.08, p = 0.43; OR 8.37; 95% CI 1.07–65.58 and p = 0.034; OR = 0.88; 95% CI 0.78–0.99, respectively). Conclusions: Our results reinforce the evidence that, in the absence of pharmacologic treatment, NASH progresses in about 40% of patients. Liver biopsy is the only mean to discriminate NAFL from NASH. The prognostic role of portal inflammation needs to be explored in larger series.