cAMP is involved in a wide variety of cellular processes that were thought to be mediated by protein kinase A (PKA). However, cAMP also directly regulates Epac1 and Epac2, guanine nucleotide-exchange factors (GEFs) for the small GTPases Rap1 and Rap2 (refs 2,3). Unfortunately, there is an absence of tools to discriminate between PKA- and Epac-mediated effects. Therefore, through rational drug design we have developed a novel cAMP analogue, 8-(4-chloro-phenylthio)-2'-O-methyladenosine-3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (8CPT-2Me-cAMP), which activates Epac, but not PKA, both in vitro and in vivo. Using this analogue, we tested the widespread model that Rap1 mediates cAMP-induced regulation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK). However, both in cell lines in which cAMP inhibits growth-factor-induced ERK activation and in which cAMP activates ERK, 8CPT-2Me-cAMP did not affect ERK activity. Moreover, in cell lines in which cAMP activates ERK, inhibition of PKA and Ras, but not Rap1, abolished cAMP-mediated ERK activation. We conclude that cAMP-induced regulation of ERK and activation of Rap1 are independent processes.
Little is known about the relative role of cAMP-dependent protein kinase (cAPK) and guanine exchange factor directly activated by cAMP (Epac) as mediators of cAMP action. We tested cAMP analogs for ability to selectively activate Epac1 or cAPK and discriminate between the binding sites of Epac and of cAPKI and cAP-KII. We found that commonly used cAMP analogs, like 8-Br-cAMP and 8-pCPT-cAMP, activate Epac and cAPK equally as well as cAMP, i.e. were full agonists. In contrast, 6-modified cAMP analogs, like N 6 -benzoyl-cAMP, were inefficient Epac activators and full cAPK activators. Analogs modified in the 2-position of the ribose induced stronger Epac1 activation than cAMP but were only partial agonists for cAPK. 2-O-Alkyl substitution of cAMP improved Epac/cAPK binding selectivity 10 -100-fold. Phenylthio substituents in position 8, particularly with MeO-or Cl-in p-position, enhanced the Epac/cAPK selectivity even more. The combination of 8-pCPT-and 2-O-methyl substitutions improved the Epac/cAPK binding selectivity about three orders of magnitude. The cAPK selectivity of 6-substituted cAMP analogs, the preferential inhibition of cAPK by moderate concentrations of Rp-cAMPS analogs, and the Epac selectivity of 8-pCPT-2-O-methyl-cAMP was also demonstrated in intact cells. Using these compounds to selectively modulate Epac and cAPK in PC-12 cells, we observed that analogs selectively activating Epac synergized strongly with cAPK specific analogs to induce neurite outgrowth. We therefore conclude that cAMP-induced neurite outgrowth is mediated by both Epac and cAPK.
The cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA I and II) and the cAMP-stimulated GDP exchange factors (Epac1 and -2) are major cAMP effectors. The cAMP affinity of the PKA holoenzyme has not been determined previously. We found that cAMP bound to PKA I with a K d value (2.9 M) similar to that of Epac1. In contrast, the free regulatory subunit of PKA type I (RI) had K d values in the low nanomolar range. The cAMP sites of RI therefore appear engineered to respond to physiological cAMP concentrations only when in the holoenzyme form, whereas Epac can respond in its free form. Epac is phylogenetically younger than PKA, and its functional cAMP site has presumably evolved from site B of PKA. A striking feature is the replacement of a conserved Glu in PKA by Gln (Epac1) or Lys (Epac2). We found that such a switch (E326Q) in site B of human RI␣ led to a 280-fold decreased cAMP affinity. A similar single switch early in Epac evolution could therefore have decreased the high cAMP affinity of the free regulatory subunit sufficiently to allow Epac to respond to physiologically relevant cAMP levels. Molecular dynamics simulations and cAMP analog mapping indicated that the E326Q switch led to flipping of Tyr-373, which normally stacks with the adenine ring of cAMP. Combined molecular dynamics simulation, GRID analysis, and cAMP analog mapping of wild-type and mutated BI and Epac1 revealed additional differences, independent of the Glu/Gln switch, between the binding sites, regarding space (roominess), hydrophobicity/polarity, and side chain flexibility. This helped explain the specificity of current cAMP analogs and, more importantly, lays a foundation for the generation of even more discriminative analogs.Lower eukaryotes like Saccharomyces cerevisiae have as sole receptor for the signaling molecule cAMP the two cAMP-binding sites (A and B) of the regulatory (R) 4 subunit of the cAMPdependent protein kinase (PKA). These tandem cAMP binding domains can be traced in all four isoforms (RI␣, RI, RII␣, and RII) of mammalian PKA (1), in the cGMP-dependent protein kinases (2, 3), the cyclic nucleotide gated ion channels (3-5), and the exchange proteins directly activated by cAMP, Epac1, and Epac2 (6). In PKA conformational changes induced by cAMP binding to both site A and B are required to dissociate the catalytic (C) subunit from the holoenzyme complex (7,8).In contrast, cAMP binding to a single site of Epac is sufficient to relieve the tonic intrachain inhibition of its GDP exchange activity toward the small GTPase Rap (6, 9). A major issue in cell signaling is how the second messenger cAMP uses the receptors PKA and Epac to coordinate biological effects (10). Comparison of the cAMP affinity of Epac1 and PKA holoenzyme would help predict which of the two cAMP receptors, if present in the same compartment, is likely to be preferentially activated by a slight increase of cAMP. For this the cAMP affinity of PKA holoenzyme, so far unknown, must be determined. The functional cAMP site in Epac is presumably derived from the B site of PKA b...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.