No abstract

The effect of two different methods of reconstruction of flatfoot deformity and the role of the posterior tibial tendon on the contact characteristics of the hindfoot joints were quantified using pressure-sensitive film. Each of 10 cadaver feet was loaded quasi-statically by an axial compressive force to simulate varying loads. First, a specimen was tested intact, then it was tested after sectioning the spring ligament and loading the specimen cyclically to create one type of flatfoot deformity. It was then tested again after reconstructing the deformity. Reconstructions used were the Dillwyn-Evans procedure (bone graft in osteotomy of the calcaneus) or the calcaneocuboid distraction arthrodesis (CCDA). We found that surgically produced flatfoot deformity altered mainly the talonavicular joint, by decreasing its contact area. The Dillwyn-Evans method had less effect on the talonavicular joint (altering 2 of 6 measured parameters) than the CCDA (3 of 6) and more effect on the anteriomedial facet (altering 3 of 6 parameters) than the CCDA (1 of 6). The Dillwyn-Evans method had more effect on the posterior facet (altering 2 of 6 measured parameters) than the CCDA (1 of 6). Function of the posterior tibial tendon had no effect on contact characteristics of the hindfoot joints after either type of reconstruction. These findings are based on measurements using a quasi-statically-loaded foot model at three selected positions, and results may be different with dynamic loading.

The goal of this study was to determine the magnitude of force transmission to the talus by its inferior articulations to provide insight into mechanisms involving acquired deformities of the hindfoot. Cadaver feet were mounted in a loading apparatus that applied axial force through the tibia and fibula as well as tensile loading of the tendons of extrinsic musculature. This also permitted positioning of the tibia in the sagittal plane. Eighteen specimens were tested in three selected positions of the gait cycle. In one series, pressure-sensitive film was inserted into the posterior and anteromedial facets of the talocalcaneal joint as well as into the talonavicular joint. In a second series, film was inserted between the talar head and the superomedial calcaneonavicular ligament. In stance position, the specimens were also tested without posterior tibial tendon (PTT) tension. Contact areas and force transmitted across the articulations were greatest in near toe-off position, in the posterior facet of the talocalcaneal joint. The talonavicular joint, the anteromedial facet of the talocalcaneal joint, and the calcaneonavicular ligament articulation showed sequentially decreasing amounts of contact area and force transmission. Mean pressures were similar across all articulations, except in the posterior facet in near toe-off position. From heel-strike to stance, to near toe-off, a trend to increasing contact area and force was noted. No difference in contact characteristics was found in the calcaneonavicular ligament articulation after PTT release. The contact force of the calcaneonavicular ligament against the talus was found to be much smaller than those of other talar articulations; however, its medially oriented direction must contribute to stabilization of the head of the talus against medial displacement. Loss of PTT tension was not found to alter the contact forces acting at the talar head in this model, which might indicate that it shares its talar stabilizing function with other structures.