Lung cancer was diagnosed in 446 patients during four years in a population living in a defined geographical area in northern Finland. The series comprised 420 men and 26 women, with a male/female ratio of 16-6:1. The diagnosis was confirmed histologically or cytologically in 431 cases (97 %). Epidermoid carcinoma was the most common histological type of tumour in the men, followed by small cell anaplastic and adenocarcinoma, whereas in the women all these types were of equal frequency. Almost all the men, but only about half of the women, were smokers or ex-smokers. The amount smoked daily had no correlation with the histological type of cancer, whereas those patients who had started smoking early had relatively more Kreyberg group I tumours (epidermoid, small cell, and large cell carcinoma) than those who had started smoking late. Cancer was usually detected on the basis of symptoms, but 17% emerged from mass radiography or some health examination, and 12 % from examinations for another disease. Fifteen per cent of the patients had no symptoms at the time of diagnosis, this being more common among the patients with epidermoid or adenocarcinoma than among those with anaplastic forms.
The clinical efficacy, tolerability and acceptability of a new multidose powder inhaler (MDPI) containing beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) were compared with those of a BDP aerosol administered with a large volume spacer (MDI-spacer) among adult asthmatics currently receiving from 500 to 1,000 µg/day of an inhaled corticosteroid. During the study, the dosage of BDP from both devices was 400 µg twice daily. Ninety-one patients were randomized to the MDPI group and 42 to the MDI-spacer group. The trial was performed as an open, randomized, parallel group multicenter study. The duration of the treatment period was 12 weeks, and the study was preceded by a 2-week run-in period. During the run-in period, the mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) was 487 and 466 1/min in the MDPI and MDI-spacer groups, respectively. After the 12-week treatment, the morning PEF was 491 l/min in the MDPI group and 463 l/min in the MDI-spacer group. The evening values were 500 and 479 l/min during the run-in period and 496 and 476 l/min after the 12-week treatment, respectively. Asthma symptom scores and the use of rescue medication were low in both groups, indicating good efficacy of the preparations tested. The median dose of histamine required to decrease forced expiratory volume in 1 s by 15% increased during the study from 800 to 1,098 µg in the MDPI group and from 795 to 960 µg in the MDI-spacer group. The most frequent adverse events in both groups were hoarseness and sore throat. There were no statistically significant differences between the treatment groups in serum cortisol values or in the number of patients with thrush. Seventy-two percent of the patients regarded the MDPI easier to use while 95% considered it more portable. Over 80% of the patients felt that the MDPI was also easier to clean and as easy or easier to learn to use than the MDI-spacer. To conclude, the novel powder inhaler is well tolerated and at least equally effective as the conventional MDI-spacer combination in the treatment of asthma with BDP. However, in everyday use, patients clearly favored the powder inhaler.
Two cases are reported in which a denture fragment was lodged in the bronchus for a period of six years. Bronchial asthma which did not worsen immediately after inhalation and other misleading factors made the diagnosis more difficult in the first case, whilst the respiratory symptoms in the second case appeared only 4 years after inhalation. Haemoptysis 2 years later led to a bronchoscopy and the removal of the foreign body.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.