As of April 2022, various countries around the world have shown their success in tackling the COVID-19 pandemic, including Indonesia. One of the COVID-19 mitigation policies in Indonesia is the involvement of students as COVID-19 ambassadors through a program called Kampus Mengajar, which carries 12 credits. However, the COVID-19 ambassador experienced academic injustice because the participating study programs and faculties did not recognize the program. The purpose of this research is to analyze the recognition of COVID-19 ambassadors who participate in the program. This research uses a case study-type qualitative research. The research setting is Universitas Ahmad Dahlan involving 70 students of the program and seven heads of faculties and study programs. Observation and in-depth interviews were administered with the head of the faculty and study programs. The results showed that study programs and faculties at universities could only recognize the activities of COVID-19 ambassador students in the program that have relevance to certain subjects. Thus, the higher education unit bureaucracy has lost its human dimension and is unfair to the student ambassadors of COVID-19. The implications of the findings of this study become a scathing critique of the fading of human values in higher education.

<span>This research aimed to analyze the insertion of anti-corruption education in Islamic education. In the context of anti-corruption education, especially students in tertiary institutions, corrupt practices are manifested in the form of corrupt behavior, such as plagiarism, cheating, truancy, and hitchhiking in group assignments, even though they do not contribute. Anti-corruption education in Islamic education has so far used a dogmatic approach, not using an approach that has a transformative impact, especially neuroscience. In this case, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, with lecturers who have special competence as anti-corruption trainers, has carried out anti-corruption education in various scientific fields, including Islamic education. This phenomenological type of qualitative research involved 52 students and six lecturers in the master study program of Islamic education. The results showed that anti-corruption education was carried out through insertion into all relevant subjects, especially the neuroscience of Islamic education. The lecturer investigates students' corrupt behavior in anticipation of future corruption crimes. The investigation results show that the most corrupt behavior of students is plagiarism, taking names in group assignments, and leaving absences with friends. The insertion of anti-corruption education with a neuroscience approach is applied in building integrity awareness that corrupt behavior is contrary to how the brain works and even has the potential to destroy reason.</span>

<div><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="left"><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="top"><p>Indonesia has agreed to the ASEAN Consensus on the Promotion and Protection of the Rights of Migrant Workers. However, many cases have proved the vulnerability of the legal protection for Indonesian migrant workers in Malaysia. In other words, the consensus has not protected the workers. Therefore, this research was conducted to analyze considerations for the regulations designed to protect post-consensus migrant workers. The objective comprised three aspects: analysis of the legislation after consensus, the draft policy that realizes the consensus, and the enforcement based on the draft formulated to safeguard the rights of migrant workers—a normative juridical method used in this research. The results showed that the consensus is a soft law that does not have a binding effect and sanction, causing it vulnerable to a violation, especially among undocumented migrant workers.  Therefore, the research recommends bureaucracy reform to reduce the administrative costs for the migrant workers, allowing them to have better legal protection.</p></td></tr></tbody></table></div>

Education can be used as a preventive measure to decrease corruption cases during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, anti-corruption education is not enough with cognitive knowledge since more emphasis should be laid on affective and psychomotor actions. A project-based learning model was used to package these actions based on factual learning resources. Therefore, this study aims to develop a project-based learning model in online anti-corruption during the pandemic. Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan (PPKn) is the Pancasila and Citizenship Education in Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Indonesia was used as research setting. Furthermore, this participatory thematic study uses 28 PPKn students for the anti-corruption education course in the odd semester 2020/2021. Google forms, online focus group discussions, and documentation (task reports) methods were adopted for data collection, and the analysis was conducted through reduction, classification, and interpretation. The results showed the development of fourteen anti-corruption actions in online media, and each one has a different target group according to its content. Therefore, anti-corruption learning does not stop at the realm of cognition but also affection which has an impact on the transformation of social media. The actions to prevent corruption are still needed even though the pandemic is over considering the new confirmed cases.

One characteristic of state law in Indonesia is the effectiveness of the administrative court, particularly the State Administrative Court (PTUN-Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara). However, the establishment, which was officially issued in Law number 5 of 1986, was brought about in 1991. It means that state administrative court was applied 46 years after Indonesia declared to be a state law. The research aims to know the urgency of State the establishment of State Administrative Law from the state law point of view. The studies applied the normative juridical method by analyzing the effective regulations to answer the research in question. The fact shows that it is an urge to establish state administrative court in Indonesia. It should have been carried out since the declaration of independence in 1945. The delay indicates that the government sees it as unnecessary to set up a state law. it is required to prevent the violation of the rights of Indonesian people by those holding the authority.