Bipolar bony lesions of the glenoid and humeral head occur frequently together in clinical practice. Surgeons should be aware that the combined defects and glenoid bone loss of 2 to 4 mm or approximately 8% to 15% of the glenoid could compromise Bankart repair and thus may require surgical strategies in addition to traditional Bankart repair alone to optimize stability.

Background This study sought to investigate complication rates/perioperative metrics after endoscopic carpal tunnel release (eCTR) via wide-awake, local anesthesia, no tourniquet (WALANT) versus sedation or local anesthesia with a tourniquet. Methods Patients aged 18 years or older who underwent an eCTR between April 28, 2018, and December 31, 2019, by 1 of 2 fellowship-trained surgeons at our single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into 3 groups: monitored anesthesia care with tourniquet (MT), local anesthesia with tourniquet (LT), and WALANT. Results Inclusion criteria were met by 156 cases; 53 (34%) were performed under MT, 25 (16%) under LT, and 78 (50%) under WALANT. The MT group (46.1 ± 9.7) was statistically younger compared with LT (56.3 ± 14.1, P = .007) and WALANT groups (53.5 ± 15.8, P = .008), F(2, 153) = 6.465, P = .002. Wide-awake, local anesthesia, no tourniquet had decreased procedural times (10 minutes, SD: 2) compared with MT (11 minutes, SD: 2) and LT (11 minutes, SD: 2), F(2, 153) = 5.732, P = .004). Trends favored WALANT over MT and LT for average operating room time (20 minutes, SD: 3 vs 32 minutes, SD: 6 vs 23 minutes, SD: 3, respectively, F(2, 153) = 101.1, P < .001), postanesthesia care unit time (12 minutes, SD: 7 vs 1:12 minutes, SD: 26 vs 20 minutes, SD: 22, respectively, F(2, 153) =171.1, P < .001), and door-to-door time (1:37 minutes, SD: 21 vs 2:51 minutes, SD: 40 vs 1:46 minutes, SD: 33, respectively, F(2, 153) = 109.3, P < .001). There were no differences in complication rates. Conclusions Our data suggest favorable trends for patients undergoing eCTR via WALANT versus MT versus LT.

Background: We attempted to evaluate patient satisfaction and overall experience during wide awake, local anesthesia, with no tourniquet (WALANT) hand surgery and quantify surgery-related outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patient demographics, comorbidities, and patient reported outcomes via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores collected pre- and postoperatively of patients undergoing WALANT surgery by the 2 participating senior authors. A solution of 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine was used by 1 surgeon, while the other used a 1:1 ratio of 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 0.5% bupivacaine for local anesthetic injection. Patients were administered a postoperative survey to assess patient experience, including anxiety and pain levels, and overall satisfaction in the perioperative period. Results: Overall, 97.7% of patients indicated that they would undergo a WALANT-style surgery if indicated in the future, 70.5% ate the day of surgery, and a total of 39.1% of patients reported driving to and from surgery. Postoperative SANE scores increased as compared with preoperative scores across all patients. The use of combination 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 0.5% bupivacaine was associated with lower intraoperative and postoperative visual analog scale pain scores. Conclusions: WALANT hand surgery was generally well tolerated with excellent surgical outcomes. Patients reported ease of preparation for surgery, faster recovery, and lack of anesthetic side effects as the main benefits of wide-awake surgery. Combination use of lidocaine and bupivacaine may be better than lidocaine alone with respect to pain control in the initial recovery period.

* Upper-extremity numbness has a wide differential diagnosis and can arise from pathology in the cervical spine, brachial plexus, shoulder, elbow, and hand.* Physical examination must include evaluation of both nerve root and peripheral nerve function to aid in determining if symptoms are due to central or peripheral pathology.* Double-crush syndrome, with both spinal and peripheral etiology, is not uncommon and, if not recognized, may lead to treatment failure.* A team approach including orthopaedic surgeons, neurologists, physiatrists, radiologists, and occupational therapists can be crucial in making the diagnosis and designing the treatment plan.* Nonoperative treatment can include observation, physical and occupational therapy, functional bracing, and injections of corticosteroids and/or local anesthetics.* Operative treatment is appropriate after an appropriate course of nonoperative management has failed or with specific diagnoses in which a delay in definitive treatment may put a patient at risk for long-term functional deficits.

The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of cast-related complications when using split or intact casts. A total of 60 patients aged 3 to 13 years with closed shaft or distal third radius and ulna fractures requiring reduction were recruited for this study. Patients underwent closed reduction under sedation and were placed into a long-arm fiberglass cast with 1 of 3 modifications: no valve, univalve, or bivalve. Patients were followed to 6 weeks after reduction or surgical treatment if required. The frequency of neurovascular injury, cast saw injury, unplanned office visits, and cast modifications, the need for operative intervention, and pain levels through the follow-up period were recorded. The results showed no incidents of compartment syndrome or neurovascular injury. Additionally, there were no differences between complications associated with cast type (P=.266), frequency of cast modifications (P=.185), or subsequent need for surgical stabilization (P=.361). Therefore, cast splitting following closed reduction of low-energy pediatric forearm fractures does not change clinical outcomes with respect to neurovascular complications, cast modifications, pain levels, or the need for repeat reduction. Consideration should be given to minimizing cast splitting after reduction of low-energy pediatric forearm fractures for practice efficiency and to potentially decrease saw-related injury. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(5):e849-e854.].