Palliative care involves the complete, holistic care of people with progressive illness and their families. People living with motor neurone disease (MND) require a range of multidisciplinary palliative care services. However, there are significant gaps in our understanding of these people's lives, experiences of services and their suggestions for service change. The present study addressed the following questions: (1) What are the lived experiences of people living with MND? (2) What are people's experiences of services? and (3) Can improvements to care be identified? A qualitative research design was adopted using semi-structured interviews. The topic guide was developed from existing literature. The study was based in three boroughs in London, UK. People living with MND and professionals were drawn from a database at King's College Hospital, and additionally, through 'snowball' sampling. Nine people with MND, five carers/family members and 15 professionals took part in the interviews. These interviews were audio-taped, transcribed and checked for accuracy against the original recordings. Themes within the interviews were coded and grouped. The analysis was facilitated with the NVIVO computer software package. The findings are presented within three substantive groups: (1) the impact of MND on people's lives (the physical impacts of the illness, including increasing disability; social issues, including restrictions on social activities; and adjustments to people's lives, including methods of coping with the illness); (2) experiences of services (accessing service entitlements, information sources, professionals' attitudes and approaches, and professionals' knowledge and understanding of MND); and (3) suggestions for service change (better information and communication, including information on service entitlements; improved knowledge amongst professionals about MND; and some suggestions for service restructuring). This study brings a fresh approach to understanding the impacts of MND and the ways in which services can be improved to meet people's needs. The paper concludes with methodological considerations, the implications of the findings for practitioners and policy makers, and suggestions for further research.
A number of palliative care outcome measures are used to facilitate the provision of palliative care. This short article reports the use of one palliative care outcome measure, the Palliative care Outcome Scale, with people with motor neurone disease (MND) living at home. The outcome measure was generally viewed positively by those involved. However, problems with this scale itself point to the need for a specialized instrument to assess palliative care outcomes for people living with MND.
Clinical outcome measures are used in clinical audit to monitor the quality of care provided to patients. As information technology (IT) is increasingly being integrated into the delivery of health care, computerising the use of clinical outcome measures has been proposed. However, little is known about the attitudes of health professionals towards this. Aims to understand professionals' views on adapting one clinical outcome measure--the palliative care outcome scale (POS)--for use on hand-held computers. Concludes that these results reinforce existing research on clinical outcome measures and IT in health care; identify special palliative care issues when considering the use of computerised clinical outcome measures with patients; and highlight the need for further research.
key determinants of smoking, gender, DM, HTN, hypercholesterolaemia and BMI. On univariate analysis, BMI was significantly higher in the NSIP subgroup (p¼0.025 vs UIP or INDET). Rates of STEMI and strokes were highest in UIP cases (n/s) whereas that of CABG was highest in the INDET subgroup. These observations were corrected for IPF severity in so far as FVC and DL CO were decreased comparably across all three radiological subgroups. Evaluation of co-existing COPD was not undertaken; however, mean FEV 1 did not differ between groups. Conclusions Amongst patients with clinical IPF, UIP morphology correlates with the highest risk of cardiovascular morbidity compared to NSIP. A tendency for ischaemic heart disease to precede IPF in the majority of cases suggests the possibility that broader systemic or cardiac-specific factors may influence the pathogenesis of these pulmonary disorders. Conclusion Although these data represent only a proportion of patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT, we found 10% of patients developed impaired PFT at 12 months with large falls in FEV 1 and FVC. These data suggest there may be as many as 60 to 120 HSCT recipients each year developing major impairment of lung function. Multi-centre prospective studies are required to fully characterise the frequency and risk factors for impaired PFT post-HSCT.
Consultant resources are freed for the treatment of more complex cases. Discussion The work to date has demonstrated the potential of e-triage to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of health-care delivery. It also suggests other opportunities for using e-referral, especially in cases where medical imaging forms a key component of the care pathway (Table 1). The work suggests a role for e-referral networks in the provision of up-to-date and accurate information on referral flows and provider performance, which again may improve the efficiency of health-care delivery.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.