No abstract

BackgroundThe Asia Pacific Society of Infection Control (APSIC) launched the APSIC Guidelines for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infections in 2018. This document describes the guidelines and recommendations for the setting prevention of surgical site infections (SSIs). It aims to highlight practical recommendations in a concise format designed to assist healthcare facilities at Asia Pacific region in achieving high standards in preoperative, perioperative and postoperative practices.MethodThe guidelines were developed by an appointed workgroup comprising experts in the Asia Pacific region, following reviews of previously published guidelines and recommendations relevant to each section.ResultsIt recommends that healthcare facilities review specific risk factors and develop effective prevention strategies, which would be cost effective at local levels. Gaps identified are best closed using a quality improvement process. Surveillance of SSIs is recommended using accepted international methodology. The timely feedback of the data analysed would help in the monitoring of effective implementation of interventions.ConclusionsHealthcare facilities should aim for excellence in safe surgery practices. The implementation of evidence-based practices using a quality improvement process helps towards achieving effective and sustainable results.

Despite a lower device use ratio in our ICUs, our device-associated healthcare-associated infection rates are higher than National Healthcare Safety Network, but lower than International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium Report.

IntroductionAmong the several newer beta lactam+beta lactase inhibitors (BL/BLI), ceftazidime-avibactam is the only drug showing activity against OXA-48-like producers. Hence, it is being increasingly used in India to treat infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), especially as a colistin-sparing agent. We have used ceftazidime-avibactam in patients suspected and confirmed to have CRE infections in our center, and present a retrospective analysis of our experience. MethodsWe conducted a single-center, retrospective study involving all patients who were treated with ceftazidimeavibactam for suspected and proven CRE infections during a one-year period at our 500-bedded hospital. Our primary objective for this study was taken as all-cause mortality. The secondary objectives were to determine the clinical cure, defined as the end of the treatment regimen with a resolution of primary infection and resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam in patients who underwent the Epsilometer test (E-test). ResultsA total of 103 patients who received ceftazidime-avibactam were identified. The all-cause mortality was 27% while a clinical cure was achieved in 73%. Fifty-two patients received empirical therapy and 51 patients received ceftazidime-avibactam for confirmed CRE infection. Forty-eight patients had an E-test done, out of which 79% of patients had CREs sensitive to ceftazidime-avibactam, and 21% of patients had ceftazidimeavibactam resistant CREs. A higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) score, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, inotrope requirement, and lower days of therapy (DOT) with ceftazidime-avibactam were found to be associated with increased mortality. ConclusionColistin has been considered to be the last-line agent in CRE infections, but there are concerns about its adverse effects and the emergence of resistance. Given our relatively low mortality of 27% in CRE infections treated with ceftazidime-avibactam, coupled with the high susceptibility of the tested isolates, there may be a role for the empirical use of this drug in infections caused by CRE, especially in a setting where colistin may not be ideal.

Background The global concern over antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is gathering pace. Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are at the epicentre of this growing public health threat and governmental and healthcare organizations are at different stages of implementing action plans to tackle AMR. The South Indian state of Kerala was one of the first in India to implement strategies and prioritize activities to address this public health threat. Strategies Through a committed and collaborative effort from all healthcare related disciplines and its professional societies from both public and private sector, the Kerala Public Private Partnership (PPP) has been able to deliver a state-wide strategy to tackle AMR A multilevel strategic leadership model and a multilevel implementation approach that included developing state-wide antibiotic clinical guidelines, a revision of post-graduate and undergraduate medical curriculum, and a training program covering all general practitioners within the state the PPP proved to be a successful model for ensuring state-wide implementation of an AMR action plan. Collaborative work of multi-professional groups ensured co-design and development of disease based clinical treatment guidelines and state-wide infection prevention policy. Knowledge exchange though international and national platforms in the form of workshops for sharing of best practices is critical to success. Capacity building at both public and private institutions included addressing practical and local solutions to the barriers e.g. good antibiotic prescription practices from primary to tertiary care facility and infection prevention at all levels. Conclusion Through 7 years of stakeholder engagement, lobbying with government, and driving change through co-development and implementation, the PPP successfully delivered an antimicrobial stewardship plan across the state. The roadmap for the implementation of the Kerala PPP strategic AMR plan can provide learning for other states and countries aiming to implement action plans for AMR.