BackgroundHysterectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures performed. Patient education, compliance, and socioeconomic status are important determinants in choosing the mode of treatment; however, medical treatment is usually inadequate. Thus, in the present study, we tried to study the various profiles of patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomies reported in tertiary care centers. Materials and MethodsBrief clinical data were noted from the case records, which include age, parity, presenting symptoms, past surgical and medical history, hemoglobin status, preoperative dilatation and curettage, and indications of hysterectomy. ResultsMost hysterectomies were performed on women between the ages of 41 and 45, with the average parity being 3.2 and the majority of cases having three children. Abnormal vaginal bleeding associated with various forms of menstrual irregularities was the most common complaint for which patients sought advice, and the incidence of patients undergoing tubal ligation was the most common previous surgery procedure, with anemia being the most common preoperative-associated condition. The fibroid was the most common demonstration in the current study, which brought forth abdominal hysterectomy for the chosen participants. ConclusionFindings from the current study suggest abdominal hysterectomy to be the most preferred route of surgery commonly in the women of age group 40 to 45 years or higher, precisely due to the occurrence of a higher parity rate in this age category. Fibroid uterus, dysfunctional uterine bleeding, and the presence of other menstrual complaints were the most probable indications for abdominal hysterectomy demonstrated by the individuals in the present study. Moreover, anemia was the most predominant complication associated preoperatively, followed by other clinical manifestations such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and urinary tract infection.

Ovarian cysts are common during pregnancy as an outcome of routine prenatal ultrasounds. Although most cases are benign, complications, such as torsion, rupture, and malignant changes, can occur. Torsion risk increases fivefold during pregnancy. It is extremely hazardous to expectant mothers and unborn children. In a rural health tertiary center, we report the case of a 23-year-old primigravida with 14 weeks of pregnancy presented with acute abdomen and nausea, vomiting for four hours. On ultrasonography, she was diagnosed with a 14 cm × 11 cm left dermoid cyst. She underwent a laprotomy, and a twisted dermoid cyst was found; therefore, a left oophorectomy was performed with consent. Histopathological examination revealed the presence of a dermoid cyst. She is regularly followed up at our center with a healthy intrauterine fetus growing within. Although antepartum surgical intervention has been proven safe, there are some risks associated with abdominal surgery for both pregnant women and their unborn children. As a result, the management strategy must be chosen based on a risk-benefit analysis of adnexal mass characterization and gestational age.