The development of disaster studies is currently very fast. Disaster events from year to year are a record as well as data on how disasters are very detrimental to human survival as a history. We need a disaster preparedness in anticipation of disaster management by paying attention to the history of disasters and their countermeasures. The authors are interested in analyzing the data from a national security perspective. The research approach used was a descriptive quantitative approach which aims to analyze and describe the history of disasters and disaster management in Indonesia. Sources of data in this study were secondary data in the form of DesInvertar Indonesia and Indonesian Disaster Risk Index data (IRBI). The data analysis technique used was the quantitative method through univariate analysis of the research variables. This research contributes to the latest knowledge regarding the history of disasters and their countermeasures in Indonesia from a national security perspective. The results showed that the incidence of disasters was increasingly varied which caused losses in society. Disasters that occurred in all regions of Indonesia in the period 1815 to 2019 were dominated by climate-induced disasters such as floods with a total of 10,438 events, landslides totaling 6,050 incidents, 2,124 drought events, and forest and land fires totaling 1,914 events. There is an increasing trend of disaster incidents every year, where the total number of disasters in 1815 amounted to 1 increased to 3,885 incidents in 2019. Maintaining national security through disaster risk management is absolutely necessary for the sovereignty of a country, so that good disaster management is a form of protection for the entire nation from all threats, especially national security threats originating from non-military threats in the disaster aspect.

[Analysis of the History, Impact and Management of Earthquake Disaster during the Covid-19 Pandemic in West Sulawesi] Geographical, demographic, sociological, meteorological and climatological conditions of Indonesia make Indonesia in a disaster-prone area (natural, non-natural, and social). This condition can be used as a laboratory to produce disaster experts, knowledge and technology in Indonesia. Law 24/2007 as a framework for disaster management systems in Indonesia currently prioritizes the disaster mitigation paradigm so that a strong commitment and participation of all parties is needed to build and run this system properly. However, currently Indonesia is faced with multiple disasters that occurred during the Covid-19 pandemic. This is supported by data on the earthquake disaster in West Sulawesi on January 15, 2021 which occurred amid the potential for the spread of Covid-19 infection. The character of the risk in this problem is how to minimize the time for evacuation, emergency response and recovery of community conditions without neglecting the potential for transmission of Covid-19 infection. This study uses a descriptive quantitative approach with secondary data in the form of BNPB volunteer desks, BNPB current situation reports and population data and civil records. The data analysis technique uses quantitative methods through univariate analysis. The results showed that the history of disaster recorded that in

Geographical, hydrological, demographic, and sociological conditions of Indonesia make Indonesia's territory prone to disasters (natural, non-natural, and social). The history of disasters shows a trend of increasing the number of victims and types of disasters. Various efforts are needed in anticipating the possibility of a disaster that will occur, so that preventing risks, reducing risks or even eliminating disaster risks by reducing vulnerability and or increasing the limited capacity of the community is the simplest solution to the complexity of the disaster problem. Disaster risk is the probability of a potential disaster with the consequent damage being a key element. A threat (danger) only becomes a disaster if it affects vulnerable communities. The community is a key element in dealing with disasters, besides being the first to know about a disaster incident, the community is not only an object but also a subject that must be empowered in disaster management. This means that whatever efforts in disaster management must lead to the community. Strategies are needed to increase community resilience to an increasing number of disaster risks. Pre-disaster mitigation and preparedness activities are needed to reduce the vulnerability of a community and to protect the community whenever a disaster occurs. This research contributes to the current knowledge of the urban community preparedness index in terms of disaster preparedness. This descriptive quantitative research uses univariate analysis as the blade of analysis with a sample of 204 respondents who live in the DKI Jakarta area, and were selected randomly. This study uses primary data. Data collection was carried out through an online google form questionnaire directly to residents of DKI Jakarta Province. The results showed that the population of DKI Jakarta Province has various socio-economic characteristics, 77.94% of respondents have had disaster experience, 46.67% of the Material Preparedness Index, 82.52% of the Knowledge and Awareness Index for Preparedness, and 52.94% of the Preparedness Index. Act. Therefore, disaster risk reduction requires the efforts of all stakeholders such as the community (individuals and communities), government agencies, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and even the business world.

Flood Disaster Mitigation Efforts in Pidie Jaya District, Aceh Province to Support National Security].This study was conducted to analyze flood disaster mitigation efforts in Pidie Jaya District to support national security. This research used a qualitative method and descriptive analysis. The data used in this research were primary and secondary data. Primary data was obtained through interviews conducted online using the zoom meeting application on March 22-25, 2021 involving several agencies in Pidie Jaya District such as, Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah (BPBD), Dinas Lingkungan Hidup, Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah (Bappeda), dan Dinas Pekerjaan Umum. Secondary data is obtained through documents held by agencies related to flood disasters. The results of this research indicate that the Pidie Jaya District Government has made mitigation efforts for flood disasters such as coordinating with related sectors, identify disaster-prone areas, conduct socialization and provide education on disaster management, as well as strengthen structures in the cliff areas of Krueng Meureudu, Krueng Putu, and Krueng Jeulanga. However, these efforts did not run optimally because one of the factors causing the flooding had not been eliminated. The solution that can be offered by the author is that it is necessary to make contingency plans and documents for disaster-prone areas, an early warning system for flood disasters, as well as legal strengthening for illegal logging actors in the upstream area of the river which is one of the factors causing flooding.