The respiratory control system is not just reflexive, it is smart, it learns, and, in fact, it has a memory. The respiratory system listens to and carefully remembers how previous stimuli affect breathing. Respiratory memory is laid down by adjusting synaptic strength between respiratory neurons. For example, repeated hypoxic bouts trigger a form of respiratory memory that functions to strengthen the ability of respiratory motoneurons to trigger contraction of breathing muscles. This type of respiratory plasticity is known as long-term facilitation (LTF). Although chemical feedback, such as hypoxia, initiates LTF, it is unknown whether natural modulation of mechanical feedback (from vagal inputs) also causes motor plasticity. Here, we used reverse microdialysis, electrophysiology, neuropharmacology, and histology to determine whether episodic modulation of vagally mediated mechanical feedback is able to induce respiratory LTF in anesthetized adult rats. We show that repeated obstructive apneas disrupt vagal feedback and trigger LTF of hypoglossal motoneuron activity and genioglossus muscle tone. This same stimulus does not cause LTF of diaphragm activity. Hypoxic episodes do not cause apnea-induced LTF; instead, LTF is triggered by modulation of vagal feedback. Unlike hypoxia-induced respiratory plasticity, vagusinduced LTF does not require 5-HT 2 receptors but instead relies on activation of ␣1-adrenergic receptors on hypoglossal motoneurons. In summary, we identify a novel form of hypoxia-and 5-HT-independent respiratory motor plasticity that is triggered by physiological modulation of vagal feedback and is mediated by ␣1-adrenergic receptor activation on (or near) hypoglossal motoneurons.

Serotonin (5-HT) is a key regulator of spinal respiratory motor plasticity. For example, spinal 5-HT receptor activation is necessary for the induction of phrenic long-term facilitation (pLTF), a form of respiratory motor plasticity triggered by moderate acute intermittent hypoxia (mAIH). mAIH-induced pLTF is blocked by cervical spinal application of the broad-spectrum 5-HT-receptor antagonist, methysergide. However, methysergide does not allow distinctions between the relative contributions of different 5-HT receptor subtypes. Intravenous administration of the Gq protein-coupled 5-HT2A/2C receptor antagonist ketanserin blocks mAIH-induced pLTF when administered before, but not after, mAIH; thus, 5-HT2 receptor activation is necessary for the induction but not maintenance of mAIH-induced pLTF. However, systemic ketanserin administration does not identify the site of the relevant 5-HT2A/2C receptors. Furthermore, this approach does not differentiate between the roles of 5-HT2A versus 5-HT2C receptors, nor does it preclude involvement of other Gq protein-coupled metabotropic 5-HT receptors capable of eliciting long-lasting phrenic motor facilitation, such as 5-HT2B receptors. Here we tested the hypothesis that mAIH-induced pLTF requires cervical spinal 5-HT2 receptor activation and determined which 5-HT2 receptor subtypes are involved. Anesthetized, paralyzed, and ventilated adult male Sprague Dawley rats were pretreated intrathecally with cervical (~C3-C5) spinal injections of subtype selective 5-HT2A/2C, 5-HT2B, or 5-HT2C receptor antagonists before mAIH. Whereas cervical spinal 5-HT2C receptor inhibition had no impact on mAIH-induced pLTF, pLTF was no longer observed after pretreatment with either 5-HT2A/2C or 5-HT2B receptor antagonists. Furthermore, spinal pretreatment with an MEK/ERK MAPK inhibitor blocked phrenic motor facilitation elicited by intrathecal injections of 5-HT2A but not 5-HT2B receptor agonists. Thus, mAIH-induced pLTF requires concurrent cervical spinal activation of both 5-HT2A and 5-HT2B receptors. However, these distinct receptor subtypes contribute to phrenic motor facilitation via distinct downstream signaling cascades that differ in their requirement for ERK MAPK signaling. The demonstration that both 5-HT2A and 5-HT2B receptors make unique contributions to mAIH-induced pLTF advances our understanding of mechanisms that underlie 5-HT-induced phrenic motor plasticity. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Moderate acute intermittent hypoxia (mAIH) triggers a persistent enhancement in phrenic motor output, an effect termed phrenic long-term facilitation (pLTF). mAIH-induced pLTF is blocked by cervical spinal application of the broad-spectrum serotonin (5-HT) receptor antagonist methysergide, demonstrating the need for spinal 5-HT receptor activation. However, the exact type of 5-HT receptors required for initiation of pLTF remains unknown. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to demonstrate that 1) spinal coactivation of two distinct Gq protein-coupled 5-HT2 receptor subtypes is necessary for mAIH-induced pLTF, and 2) these receptors contribute to pLTF via cascades that differ in their requirement for ERK MAPK signaling.

Cervical spinal adenosine 2A (A ) receptor activation elicits a prolonged increase in phrenic nerve activity, an effect known as phrenic motor facilitation (pMF). The specific cervical spinal cells expressing the relevant A receptors for pMF are unknown. This is an important question since the physiological outcome of A receptor activation is highly cell type specific. Thus, we tested the hypothesis that the relevant A receptors for pMF are expressed in phrenic motor neurons per se versus non-phrenic neurons of the cervical spinal cord. A receptor immunostaining significantly colocalized with NeuN-positive neurons (89 ± 2%). Intrapleural siRNA injections were used to selectively knock down A receptors in cholera toxin B-subunit-labelled phrenic motor neurons. A receptor knock-down was verified by a ∼45% decrease in A receptor immunoreactivity within phrenic motor neurons versus non-targeting siRNAs (siNT; P < 0.05). There was no evidence for knock-down in cervical non-phrenic motor neurons. In rats that were anaesthetized, subjected to neuromuscular blockade and ventilated, pMF induced by cervical (C3-4) intrathecal injections of the A receptor agonist CGS21680 was greatly attenuated in siA (21%) versus siNT treated rats (147%; P < 0.01). There were no significant effects of siA on phrenic burst frequency. Collectively, our results support the hypothesis that phrenic motor neurons express the A receptors relevant to A receptor-induced pMF.

Background Inflammation undermines multiple forms of neuroplasticity. Although inflammation and its influence on plasticity in multiple neural systems has been extensively studied, its effects on plasticity of neural networks controlling vital life functions, such as breathing, are less understood. In this study, we investigated the signaling mechanisms whereby lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced systemic inflammation impairs plasticity within the phrenic motor system—a major spinal respiratory motor pool that drives contractions of the diaphragm muscle. Here, we tested the hypotheses that lipopolysaccharide-induced systemic inflammation (1) blocks phrenic motor plasticity by a mechanism that requires cervical spinal okadaic acid-sensitive serine/threonine protein phosphatase (PP) 1/2A activity and (2) prevents phosphorylation/activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 mitogen activated protein kinase (ERK1/2 MAPK)—a key enzyme necessary for the expression of phrenic motor plasticity. Methods To study phrenic motor plasticity, we utilized a well-characterized model for spinal respiratory plasticity called phrenic long-term facilitation (pLTF). pLTF is characterized by a long-lasting, progressive enhancement of inspiratory phrenic nerve motor drive following exposures to moderate acute intermittent hypoxia (mAIH). In anesthetized, vagotomized and mechanically ventilated adult Sprague Dawley rats, we examined the effect of inhibiting cervical spinal serine/threonine PP 1/2A activity on pLTF expression in sham-vehicle and LPS-treated rats. Using immunofluorescence optical density analysis, we compared mAIH-induced phosphorylation/activation of ERK 1/2 MAPK with and without LPS-induced inflammation in identified phrenic motor neurons. Results We confirmed that mAIH-induced pLTF is abolished 24 h following low-dose systemic LPS (100 μg/kg, i.p.). Cervical spinal delivery of the PP 1/2A inhibitor, okadaic acid, restored pLTF in LPS-treated rats. LPS also prevented mAIH-induced enhancement in phrenic motor neuron ERK1/2 MAPK phosphorylation. Thus, a likely target for the relevant okadaic acid-sensitive protein phosphatases is ERK1/2 MAPK or its upstream activators. Conclusions This study increases our understanding of fundamental mechanisms whereby inflammation disrupts neuroplasticity in a critical population of motor neurons necessary for breathing, and highlights key roles for serine/threonine protein phosphatases and ERK1/2 MAPK kinase in the plasticity of mammalian spinal respiratory motor circuits.

Episodic hypoxia causes repetitive inspiratory activation that induces a form of respiratory plasticity termed long-term facilitation (LTF). While LTF is a function of the hypoxic exposures and inspiratory activation, their relative importance in evoking LTF is unknown. The aims of this study were to: (1) dissociate the relative roles played by episodic hypoxia and respiratory activation in LTF; and (2) determine whether the magnitude of LTF varies as a function of hypoxic intensity. We did this by examining the effects of episodic hypoxia in postnatal rats (15-25 days old), which unlike adult rats exhibit a prominent hypoxia-induced respiratory depression. We quantified inspiratory phrenic nerve activity generated by the in situ working-heart brainstem before, during and for 60 min after episodic hypoxia. We demonstrate that episodic hypoxia evokes LTF despite the fact that it potently suppresses inspiratory activity during individual hypoxic exposures (P < 0.05). Specifically, we show that after episodic hypoxia (three 5 min periods of 10% O 2 ) respiratory frequency increased to 40 ± 3.3% above baseline values over the next 60 min (P < 0.001). Continuous hypoxia (15 min of 10% O 2 ) had no lasting effects on respiratory frequency (P > 0.05). To determine if LTF magnitude was affected by hypoxic intensity, the episodic hypoxia protocol was repeated under three different O 2 tensions. We demonstrate that the magnitude and time course of LTF depend on hypoxic severity, with more intense hypoxia inducing a more potent degree of LTF. We conclude that inspiratory activation is not required for LTF induction, and that hypoxia per se is the physiological stimulus for eliciting hypoxia-induced respiratory LTF.