Vascular endothelial cells lining the arteries are sensitive to wall shear stress (WSS) exerted by flowing blood. An important component of the pathophysiology of vascular diseases, WSS is commonly estimated by centerline ultrasound Doppler velocimetry (UDV). However, the accuracy of this method is uncertain. We have previously validated the use of a novel, ultrasound-based, particle image velocimetry technique (echo PIV) to compute 2-D velocity vector fields, which can easily be converted into WSS data. We compared WSS data derived from UDV and echo PIV in the common carotid artery of 27 healthy participants. Compared with echo PIV, time-averaged WSS was lower using UDV (28 ± 35%). Echo PIV revealed that this was due to considerable spatiotemporal variation in the flow velocity profile, contrary to the assumption that flow is steady and the velocity profile is parabolic throughout the cardiac cycle. The largest WSS underestimation by UDV was found during peak systole (118 ± 16%) and the smallest during mid-diastole (4.3± 46%). The UDV method underestimated WSS for the accelerating and decelerating systolic measurements (68 ± 30% and 24 ± 51%), whereas WSS was overestimated for end-diastolic measurements (-44 ± 55%). Our data indicate that UDV estimates of WSS provided limited and largely inaccurate information about WSS and that the complex spatiotemporal flow patterns do not fit well with traditional assumptions about blood flow in arteries. Echo PIV-derived WSS provides detailed information about this important but poorly understood stimulus that influences vascular endothelial pathophysiology.

No abstract

No abstract

The purpose of the study was to evaluate event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS) and safety for early addition of arsenic trioxide (As(2)O(3)) as frontline consolidation therapy compared to high-dose arabinoside (HiDAC) in adult patients with de novo acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). 271 patients (aged 17-65 years) received consolidation therapy containing As(2)O(3) (two 21-day courses) or HiDAC regimen. EFS at 5 years was 75% versus 54% (P < 0.001), and OS at 5 years was 83% versus 71% (P = 0.002) in As(2)O(3) and HiDAC treatment arms. 139 patients treated with As(2)O(3), EFS at 5 years reached 79% versus 56% (P = 0.014), but OS at 5 years was 77% versus 84% (P = 0.32) in low-risk (WBC ≤ 10 × 10(9)/L) and high-risk (WBC > 10 × 10(9)/L) cohorts. Further, patients treated with As(2)O(3) rarely incurred agranulocytosis (1.4%, P < 0.001), or severe infection (0.7%, P < 0.001). It is still very well tolerated compared to HiDAC. We confirmed that As(2)O(3) as a first-line consolidation regimen provided significant benefits of OS to patients with APL. The As(2)O(3) regimen made low-risk patients gain more EFS benefits than high-risk group. The high-risk cohort receiving As(2)O(3) overcame the negative impact, yielding OS similar to that for with the low-risk patients treated with As(2)O(3).

Ultrasound image velocimetry (UIV) allows for the non-intrusive measurement of a wide range of flows without the need for optical transparency. In this study, we used UIV to measure the local velocity field of a model drilling fluid that exhibits yield stress flow behavior. The radial velocity profile was used to determine the yield stress and the Herschel-Bulkley model flow index n and the consistency index k. Reference data were obtained using the conventional offline Couette rheometry. A comparison showed reasonable agreement between the two methods. The discrepancy in model parameters could be attributed to inherent differences between the methods, which cannot be captured by the three-parameter model used. Overall, with a whole flow field measurement technique such as UIV, we were able to quantify the complex rheology of a model drilling fluid. These preliminary results show that UIV can be used as a non-intrusive diagnostic for in situ, real-time measurement of complex opaque flow rheology.