This study aims to find how women workers' protection is linked to a feminist legal approach, referring to the job creation law. The study revealed there was no improvement in the law. It tended to be detrimental, especially the discussion of three articles: 59, 79, and 81. Feminist Legal Theory sees the need for a breakthrough, the making and enacting laws against women. This is to eliminate discrimination, marginalization, and subordination by law against women. The study employed normative juridical research, involving the statute and conceptual approaches. The data were collected by a literature study involving descriptive data analysis techniques. The study showed women workers' protection, the Job Creation Law has not improved. It is even more destructive, especially the regulation of limitation periods in employment contracts, weekly rest, and contract labour abolition.

The purpose of the research is to analyze first, the criminal arrangement of the perpetrators of refugee smuggling and its implementation in Indonesia. Second, if a restorative justice approach can be an alternative in an effort to strengthen the criminalization process for perpetrators of refugee smugglers. This normative juridical research uses a statutory and conceptual approaches. The results of the study conclude that first, criminal arrangements for perpetrators of smuggling refugees in Indonesia are regulated in Article 120 of Law Number 6 of 2011 on Immigration (Immigration Law). The regulation is very simple and in its implementation creates obstacles for law enforcement officers, including the absence of special rules, the absence of differentiating the threat of criminal sanctions between perpetrators, and obstacles in regulating the threat of special minimum and maximum imprisonment sanctions which are considered to greatly limit the space for law enforcers in an effort to provide fair punishment for the perpetrators. Second, the restorative justice approach can be an alternative in an effort to strengthen the criminal justice process against perpetrators of refugee smugglers by integrating them into the criminal justice system. The process of meeting between perpetrators and victims as well as the community runs in parallel with the process in court and the results can be considered by the judge when they want to impose a sentence on each perpetrator of refugee smuggling.

The implementation of the Village Head Election (Pemilihan Kepala Desa) still leaves some problems. This study aims to analyze and describe the implementation of honest and fair principles based on indicators of the electoral justice system in the implementation of village head elections in Sleman Regency in particular and Indonesia in general. This study also aims to describe a model of the electoral justice system that can be developed in the upcoming Pemilihan Kepala Desa to resolve law enforcement issues in the Pemilihan Kepala Desa, one of which is through the application of a restorative justice model. This study uses empirical legal research methods with primary and secondary data sources. Primary data sources were obtained from the results of research in the field through an interview process with 20 key informants in the implementation of the Pemilihan Kepala Desa in Sleman Regency in 2021 spread over 9 (nine) villages. The secondary data sources used consist of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials obtained through literature study. The data analysis technique is qualitative data analysis through statutory and conceptual approaches. The results showed that the Pemilihan Kepala Desa in Sleman Regency in particular and Indonesia, in general, had not been held honestly and fairly. It is necessary to reorganize the Pemilihan Kepala Desa rules through an electoral justice system model approach, especially for normative design indicators and performance indicators of the Pemilihan Kepala Desa system. The application of restorative justice can strengthen efforts to enforce the Pemilihan Kepala Desa law in the future.