No abstract

Apolipoproteins are protein constituents of plasma lipid transport particles. Human apolipoprotein A-IV (apoA-IV) was expressed in the liver of C57BL/6 mice and mice deficient in apoE, both of which are prone to atherosclerosis, to investigate whether apoA-IV protects against this disease. In transgenic C57BL/6 mice on an atherogenic diet, the serum concentration of high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol increased by 35 percent, whereas the concentration of endogenous apoA-I decreased by 29 percent, relative to those in transgenic mice on a normal diet. Expression of human apoA-IV in apoE-deficient mice on a normal diet resulted in an even more severe atherogenic lipoprotein profile, without affecting the concentration of HDL cholesterol, than that in nontransgenic apoE-deficient mice. However, transgenic mice of both backgrounds showed a substantial reduction in the size of atherosclerotic lesions. Thus, apoA-IV appears to protect against atherosclerosis by a mechanism that does not involve an increase in HDL cholesterol concentration.

No abstract

Apolipoprotein E phenotypes were determined in 361 patients with hyperlipidemia and in controls. The E2 isoform was significantly more frequent in the group of hyperlipidemics (P less than 0.0005). This was not due to a higher frequency of E-2/2 homozygotes with type III hyperlipoproteinemia, but rather to a significantly higher frequency of E2 heterozygotes (P less than 0.0005). Subgrouping of hyperlipidemics into patients with a) hypertriglyceridemia, b) hypercholesterolemia and c) mixed hyperlipidemia revealed i) that isoform E2 was significantly more frequent in patients with hypertriglyceridemia (0.001 greater than P greater than 0.005), ii) that isoform E4 was significantly more frequent in patients with hypercholesterolemia (0.01 greater than P greater than 0.005) and iii) that isoforms E2 (P less than 0.005) and E4 (0.05 greater than P greater than 0.025) were both more frequent in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia. Roughly 20% of patients with mixed hyperlipidemia had one of the rare phenotypes E-4/4, -4/2 or -2/2. We conclude that alleles epsilon 2 and epsilon 4 both contribute to the susceptibility for, and/or phenotypic expression of hyperlipidemia. Whereas the gene epsilon 2 seems to exert its influence on plasma lipoproteins by an abnormal gene product (E2) that has reduced binding activity to lipoprotein receptors, the mechanism underlying the association of the epsilon 4 gene with hyperlipidemia is presently unclear.

Background: As part of the NIH/National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Contract for the Standardization of Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] Measurements, a study was performed in collaboration with the IFCC Working Group for the Standardization of Lp(a) Assays. The aims of the study, performed with the participation of 16 manufacturers and 6 research laboratories, were to evaluate the IFCC proposed reference material (PRM) for its ability to transfer an accuracy-based value to the immunoassay calibrators and to assess concordance in results among different methods. Methods: Two different purified Lp(a) preparations with protein mass concentrations determined by amino acid analysis were used to calibrate the reference method. A Lp(a) value of 107 nmol/L was assigned to PRM. After uniformity of calibration was demonstrated in the 22 evaluated systems, Lp(a) was measured on 30 fresh-frozen sera covering a wide range of Lp(a) values and apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] sizes. Results: The among-laboratory CVs for these samples (6–31%) were, in general, higher than those obtained for PRM (2.8%) and the quality-control samples (14%, 12%, and 9%, respectively), reflecting the broad range of apo(a) sizes in the 30 samples and the sensitivity of most methods to apo(a) size heterogeneity. Thus, although all of the assays were uniformly calibrated through the use of PRM, no uniformity in results was achieved for the isoform-sensitive methods. Conclusions: Linear regression analyses indicated that to various degrees, apo(a) size heterogeneity affects the outcome of the immunochemical methods used to measure Lp(a). We have also shown that the inaccuracy of Lp(a) values determined by methods sensitive to apo(a) size significantly affects the assessment of individual risk status for coronary artery disease.