The ability to predict student performance in a course or program creates opportunities to improve educational outcomes. With effective performance prediction approaches, instructors can allocate resources and instruction more accurately. Research in this area seeks to identify features that can be used to make predictions, to identify algorithms that can improve predictions, and to quantify aspects of student performance. Moreover, research in predicting student performance seeks to determine interrelated features and to identify the underlying reasons why certain features work better than others. This working group report presents a systematic literature review of work in the area of predicting student performance. Our analysis shows a clearly increasing amount of research in this area, as well as an increasing variety of techniques used. At the same time, the review uncovered a number of issues with research quality that drives a need for the community to provide more detailed reporting of methods and results and to increase efforts to validate and replicate work.

Collaboration is a complex phenomenon, where intersubjective dynamics can greatly affect the productive outcome. Evaluation of collaboration is thus of great interest, and can potentially help achieve better outcomes and performance. However, quantitative measurement of collaboration is difficult, because much of the interaction occurs in the intersubjective space between collaborators. Manual observation and/or self-reports are subjective, laborious, and have a poor temporal resolution. The problem is compounded in natural settings where task-activity and response-compliance cannot be controlled. Physiological signals provide an objective mean to quantify intersubjective rapport (as synchrony), but require novel methods to support broad deployment outside the lab. We studied 28 student dyads during a self-directed classroom pair-programming exercise. Sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system activation was measured during task performance using electrodermal activity and electrocardiography. Results suggest that (a) we can isolate cognitive processes (mental workload) from confounding environmental effects, and (b) electrodermal signals show role-specific but correlated affective response profiles. We demonstrate the potential for social physiological compliance to quantify pair-work in natural settings, with no experimental manipulation of participants required. Our objective approach has a high temporal resolution, is scalable, non-intrusive, and robust.

No abstract

No abstract

Conventional wisdom holds that time is an integral part of the learning process. Spacing out learning over multiple study sessions seems to be better for learning than having a single longer study session. Learners should also take pauses from the learning process to absorb, assimilate, and analyze what they have just learned. At the same time, pausing too often can be harmful for learning. Participants of two subsequent introductory programming courses completed programming tasks in an integrated development environment that saved detailed logs of their actions, including time stamps of all the participants' keypresses in said environment. Using this data with background variables and a self-regulation metric questionnaire, we study how the students space out their work, identify trends in between the kinds of pauses the participants took and the course outcomes, and their connection to background variables. Based on our research, students tend to space out their work, working on multiple days each week. In addition, a high relative amount of pauses of only a few seconds correlated positively with exam scores, while a high relative amount of pauses of a few minutes correlated negatively with exam scores. Student pausing behaviors are poorly explained by traditional self-regulation measures such as the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire and other background variables.