Ischemic spinal cord infarction is rare in the paediatric population, and when it does occur, it is usually associated with traumatic injury. Other potential causes include congenital cardiovascular malformations, cerebellar herniation, thromboembolic disease and infection. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings can be subtle in the early evaluation of such patients. The outcome is variable and depends on the level and extent of the spinal cord infarct and subsequent rehabilitation. Here, we present two cases of ischemic spinal cord infarction in children.
Objectives: This comparative study was conducted at Mayo Hospital, Lahore from April 2004 to May 2005 to compare the results of primary repair and exteriorization in cases of typhoid perforation Materials and methods: :80 patients were selected out of which 48 were males and 32 were females. Inclusion criteria: Consisted of a history of fever abdominal pain, constipation, sharp shooting pain superimposed over the colicky abdominal pain clinical finding included tense tender abdomen and absent bowel sounds, investigations including gas under diaphragm in abdominal x-ray and positive widal test. Exclusion criteria: Consisted of negative Widal test even if there was gas under diaphragm, per op findings suggestive of tuberculosis or histopathology reports suggestive of tuberculosis or any pathology other than typhoid. Primary repair was done in patients who presented within 36 hrs of experiencing sharp shooting pain and per op findings of minimal contamination. Exteriorization in the form of loop or double barrel ileostomy was done in other cases.
At Leeds General Infirmary, a busy tertiary centre for neurosurgery, there has been little visibility of the step-down status of the patients from intensive care to high dependency or from the latter to a ward bed. The only record of the current situation was limited to the paper notes of the bed managers. Furthermore, accuracy of electronic systems used for staffing levels and bed state were underused. There were gaps in information and furthermore information within the system was unreliable (together defined as ‘defects’). These defects mandated bed managers’ physical presence on each ward to obtain reliable data. This led to unwarranted critical care stays and resultant high rates (up to 40%) of elective operation cancellations requiring a critical care bed.The Leeds Improvement Method using principles of the Toyota Production System aimed to improve patient flow through critical care and to assess the impact on elective case activity. Problems were identified and changes were implemented over a 1-week period. The changes included measures to reduce time taken for collation of critical bed-state information and improving patient and staffing data quality collected in the electronic patient management system (EPMS) and electronic staffing record (ESR). Impact was monitored for 30 days pre-implementation and post-implementation.Following intervention, the time taken by the bed manager to gather live bed-state information decreased from 50 to 9 min; the EPMS storing correct bed-state data was improved from 71% to 0% defect; the ESR was improved from 100% to 4% defects; critical care patient step-downs occurring at night (after 20:00) improved from 80% to 20%; and the number of cancelled elective cases over a 30-day period reduced from nine to one.Implementing these organisational efficiencies can significantly improve critical care patient flow and elective case throughput.
Citation Systematic ReviewPage 16 ABSTRACTIntroduction: Chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH) is one of the commonest forms of intracranial haemorrhage. Surgical drainage of CSDH is a routine operation in the modern neurosurgical practice which has shown to be the most effective way in treating this entity; however, the incidence of recurrence of the haematoma post operatively remains as high as 26.5%. The risk factors for CSDH recurrence remains an area of ongoing research. Objective: We have conducted a systematic review to evaluate the available literature addressing the risk factors for CSDH recurrence, aiming to minimise or at least identify patients at higher risk of recurrence in order to decrease associated morbidity. Methods: Ovid via Medline, PubMed, and Google scholar databases were searched for eligible studies, search results were then limited to studies in English language, Humans and studies published within the last 5 years. The included studies were critically appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool, and each study has then been ranked using the Harbour and Miller hierarchy of ranking.Results: Based on available evidence, we classified the risk factors associated with recurrence to patients', radiological, and surgical factors. Patient factors include history of seizures, trauma, alcoholism, brain atrophy, and presence of CSF shunts, while the role of diabetes in relation to the recurrence is controversial. Radiologically the presence of air in the subdural space post-operatively, the width of the haematoma, and the presence of bilateral CSDHs are associated with increased risk of recurrence. While the predictive value of multiple membranes in the CSDH remains controversial. Surgically, the risk of recurrence was noted to be higher in patients with parietal or occipital compared to those who had frontal burr hole drainage, also placing a subdural drain decreases the chance of recurrence and some evidence showed better outcomes for frontally placed drains. The role of anti-inflammatory agents (including steroids) remains an area of ongoing debate. Conclusions: Risk factors for CSDH can be divided into patients', radiological, and surgical factors. We encourage health care providers to minimize if not prevent potentially avoidable factors. Patients with increased risks for recurrence should be identified early by the treating team and when possible should be informed about their higher than usual risk of recurrence. Moreover this review highlights the general lack of a sufficiently powered class I evidence addressing this topic and that further research is required in this topic.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.