Objectives
The objectives of this study were to evaluate first-year undergraduate female preclinical medical students' behaviours, experiences, and emotions regarding cadaver dissection. The evaluation was performed during the 2013–2014 academic year, six months after starting the dissection course.
Methods
A 14-statement questionnaire was administered to a group of 200 first-year undergraduate female preclinical medical students at the College of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University (KAU), KSA. For each question, the students responded by selecting either “Yes,” “No,” or “Undecided.” Statistical analysis was performed after collection of the questionnaire responses.
Results
The results showed that 90% of the students agreed that cadaver dissection provided the best and shortest way to study anatomy. Also, 89% were excited during their first visit to the dissection room, and 79% were satisfied that dissection of a cadaver was ethically acceptable. The majority of the students (over 90%) declared that dissection of a cadaver was one of the best teaching strategies for facilitating the acquisition of knowledge of human anatomy.
Conclusions
Saudi female first-year undergraduate medical students at KAU showed positive attitudes toward cadaver dissection during their human anatomy course. This study prompts the need for exploration of gender differences in perception regarding cadaver dissection.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was done among during 2016/2017. A multi-stage stratified random sample was used, and 304 students were selected. A validated, self-administered data collection sheet was used. It included ID migraine ™, and the Migraine Disability Assessment Score
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.