Objective
Few studies carried out more than 20 years ago have evaluated spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) recurrence in patients receiving secondary antibiotic prophylaxis. These studies reported a 1-year recurrence rate of 20–26%. Changes in the bacteriology of SBP over the last few years might have negative effects on secondary prophylaxis. Our primary aim was to estimate the incidence of SBP recurrence in patients with cirrhosis receiving secondary prophylaxis with norfloxacin and to explore the factors associated with SBP recurrence.
Patients and methods
This was a retrospective cohort study of patients receiving norfloxacin for the secondary prophylaxis of SBP from 1 March 2003 to 31 March 2016. Follow-up was performed for 365 days after secondary prophylaxis was started. A competing risk analysis approach was used.
Results
A total of 115 patients were included. The prevalence of quinolone-resistant and multiresistant bacteria in the first episode of SBP among patients with culture-positive SBP was 70.96% [95% confidence interval (CI): 51.96–85.77%] and 12.90% (95% CI: 3.63–29.83%), respectively. The cumulative incidence of SBP recurrence was 28.53% (95% CI: 20.15–37.45%) after 365 days. Male patients showed an estimated subhazard ratio of SBP recurrence of 2.52 (95% CI: 1.07–5.91, P=0.034). No other risk factors for SBP recurrence were identified. The overall cumulative incidence of death after 365 days was 21.57% (95% CI: 14.14–30.04%), without significant differences among patients with or without SBP recurrence.
Conclusion
Even though changes in the bacteriology of SBP occurred over time, its recurrence rate in patients receiving norfloxacin remains similar to what was reported in the initial studies.
Short-term acute kidney injury and mortality rates were similar in patients with spontaneous bacteremia and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Risk assessment of patients with spontaneous bacteremia can be performed with baseline MELD score.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.