Background-Goblet cell hyperplasia (GCH) is a prominent feature in animal models of atopic asthma produced by immunisation and following multiple challenges with antigens. The aim of this study was to examine the eVect of a 2 agonist on the development of GCH induced by the immune response. Methods-Brown Norway rats were immunised and challenged with an aerosol of ovalbumin for four weeks. Salbutamol (0.5 mg/kg/day) or vehicle was continuously delivered for the four weeks using a subcutaneously implanted osmotic minipump. The density of goblet cells, other morphological changes, and airway responsiveness to methacholine were evaluated 24 hours after the final challenge.
Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) is a pro-inflammatory cytokine that reportedly counteracts the anti-inflammatory effect of endogenous glucocorticoids. There have only been a few reports that demonstrate a potential link between MIF and bronchial asthma. In an attempt to further clarify the precise role of MIF in asthma, the present authors examined the effect of anti-MIF antibody (Ab) on airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness in an ovalbumin-immunised rat asthma model.Actively immunised Brown Norway rats received ovalbumin inhalation with or without treatment of anti-MIF Ab. The levels of MIF in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid were significantly elevated after the ovalbumin challenge.An immunohistochemical study revealed positive immunostaining for MIF in bronchial epithelium, even in nonsensitised rats, and the MIF staining in bronchial epithelium was enhanced after the ovalbumin challenge. Anti-MIF Ab significantly decreased the number of total cells, neutrophils and eosinophils in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of the ovalbumin-challenged rats, and also attenuated the ovalbumin-induced airway hyperresponsiveness to ovalbumin and methacholine. However, anti-MIF Ab did not affect the level of serum ovalbumin-specific IgE, suggesting that anti-MIF Ab did not suppress immunisation itself.The results indicate that macrophage migration inhibitory factor plays a crucial role in airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma.
Background: The concentration of exhaled nitric oxide ([NO]) has been reported to reflect the inflammatory process of airways in patients with bronchial asthma, particularly when they are steroid naive. However, it is not fully understood whether it equally reflects the degree of airway inflammation in patients receiving inhaled corticosteroids, but whose symptoms are not necessarily well controlled. Objective: To examine whether the exhaled [NO] really reflects airway inflammation in patients with bronchial asthma, regardless of treatment with inhaled steroids. Methods: Exhaled [NO] was measured in patients with bronchial asthma (43 steroid treated and 32 steroid naive), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (n = 36), bronchiectasis (n = 10) and in control subjects (n = 26). We examined in each asthmatic group whether the exhaled [NO] correlated with parameters reflecting airway inflammation. Results: Exhaled [NO] was significantly correlated with symptom score, clinical severity, circulating eosinophil count, and the percentage of eosinophils in induced sputum in the steroid-naive asthmatics, but not in the steroid-treated asthmatics, although airway inflammation in this group was not well controlled, as evidenced by clinical symptoms and the higher percentage of eosinophils in induced sputum. Exhaled [NO] from the patients with COPD (6.2 ± 0.7 ppb) or bronchiectasis (5.4 ± 1.3 ppb) was not significantly increased compared with the controls (6.0 ± 1.0 ppb), and was significantly lower than in the asthmatic patients as a whole (19.0 ± 2.0 ppb). Conclusions: Although exhaled [NO] is a useful marker of airway inflammation for differential diagnosis and evaluation of severity in steroid-naive patients with bronchial asthma, it may not be as useful in steroid-treated patients.
Dissociation between airway responsiveness to methacholine and responsiveness to antigen. A. Kamachi, Y. Nasuhara, M. Nishimura, T. Takahashi, Y. Homma, Y. Ohtsuka, M. Munakata. #ERS Journals Ltd 2002. ABSTRACT: Repeated aerosolized antigen challenges to brown Norway (BN) rats generate nonspecific airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR). On the other hand, some studies have demonstrated that repeated antigen challenge could attenuate antigenspecific AHR in BN rats. The authors questioned whether such dissociation in airway responses actually occurs when assessed in a single study in the same animals.The authors simultaneously measured AHR to methacholine and antigen-specific AHR in rats that were repeatedly exposed to aerosolized ovalbumin (OA) for 1 or 3 months after sensitization. Four days after the last challenge, airway responses to methacholine and OA, morphometry of the airways, the cell profile in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, and cytokine messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) expression in the lungs were evaluated.The two types of AHR were modulated in opposite directions by repeated antigen challenges. The AHR to methacholine was significantly increased in the rats receiving antigen challenges compared with the control rats receiving saline challenges after sensitization; whereas, the antigen-specific AHR was significantly decreased. The number of alveolar macrophages in lavaged fluid and the expression of transforming growth factor-b 1 mRNA in lung tissue was significantly different between the antigenchallenged rats and the control rats.In conclusion, dissociation between nonspecific airway hyperresponsiveness and antigen-specific airway hyperresponsiveness in brown Norway rats after repeated antigen challenges was demonstrated. Sustained airway inflammation with macrophages and/or upregulation of transforming growth factor-b 1 messenger ribonucleic acid in the lung tissue may be responsible for this dissociation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.