No abstract

Background Thrombus formation is an important factor affecting cardiovascular events and venous thromboembolism in type 2 diabetes. However, it is unclear whether glycemic control reduces thrombogenicity. We investigated the effect of short-term glycemic control (STUDY 1) and hypoglycemia (STUDY 2) on thrombus formation using an automated microchip flow chamber system. Methods For STUDY 1, we recruited 10 patients with type 2 diabetes. Before and after 2 weeks of treatment, blood glucose was analyzed with a continuous glucose monitoring system, and thrombogenicity was analyzed with an automated microchip flow chamber system. For STUDY 2, we recruited 10 subjects without diabetes who underwent an insulin tolerance test. We evaluated the change in thrombogenic potential with hypoglycemia. Results STUDY1: The mean blood glucose level reduced from 10.1 ± 2.6 to 6.9 ± 0.97 mM ( P < 0.01). T10, an indicator of thrombogenicity, significantly attenuated after glycemic control (338 ± 65 vs. 425 ± 117 s, P < 0.05). The attenuation in T10 was significantly correlated with changes in mean blood glucose level after treatment ( r = − 0.718, P < 0.05). STUDY 2: Platelet function was enhanced with decreasing blood glucose; increased platelet function was strongly correlated with an increase in epinephrine. Conclusions We demonstrated attenuation in thrombogenicity with short-term comprehensive diabetes care and enhancement in thrombogenicity with hypoglycemia, using a new flow chamber system. Trial registration UMIN-CTR UMIN 000019899 , registered 26-Jan-2015 (STUDY 2). Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12959-019-0206-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Aim: Elevated level of serum triglyceride (TG) is a characteristic of type 2 diabetes. We evaluated the clinical significance of intervention for the serum TG levels in the fasting and postprandial states in patients with type 2 diabetes.Methods: Fifty patients with type 2 diabetes, treated with statins, were selected and divided into two groups. One group was treated with a combination of fenofibrate and ezetimibe (F/E group) and the other group with statins (statin group) for 12 weeks. The lipoprotein profile of both groups was compared using high-performance liquid chromatography, and the vascular function was assessed using flow-mediated dilation (FMD) at the forearm.Results: The levels of very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol, malondialdehyde low-density lipoprotein (MDA-LDL), total TG, chylomicron-TG, VLDL-TG, and HDL-TG decreased in the F/E group, whereas those of HDL cholesterol increased. Furthermore, the peak particle size of LDL increased, but that of HDL decreased in the F/E group. The combination treatment significantly improved the FMD. The change in the cholesterol level in a very small fraction of HDL was a significant independent predictor for determining the improvement of FMD (p < 0.01).Conclusions: Compared with the treatment with statins, the treatment with the combination of fenofibrate and ezetimibe effectively controlled the LDL cholesterol and TG levels, increased the HDL cholesterol level, especially in its small fraction, and improved vascular function of patients with type 2 diabetes.

No abstract

Introduction Several studies have recently pointed out the role of many inflammatory mediators in the progression of diabetes complications. We had previously demonstrated that mRNA expression of platelet-activating factor receptor (PAFR) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was associated with urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (ACR) and forearm flow-mediated dilatation in patients with type 2 diabetes. In an attempt to elucidate this association, patients were followed up for 1 year. Materials and methodsWe recruited 95 patients from the hospital outpatient clinic, among whom 86 were followed up for 1 year (normoalbuminuria: 40 patients, microalbuminuria: 25 patients, macroalbuminuria: 21 patients). We then measured their baseline and 12 month characteristics and collected blood samples to extract PBMCs and measure gene expressions. Results Despite higher mRNA expression of PAFR in PBMCs among patients with macroalbuminuria, the rise in its value was not associated with biomarkers of nephropathy, while baseline values were not associated with progression of nephropathy. Moreover, changes in mRNA expression of PAFR were correlated with changes in ACR in all patients (r = 0.225, p = 0.037) and estimated glomerular filtration rate in patients with macroalbuminuria (r = − 0.438, p = 0.047) during the follow-up period. Conclusion Our findings indicate that even though no causal relationship exists between diabetic nephropathy and elevated expression of PAFR in PBMCs, their close association signifies the presence of another common mechanism that could induce both events. Given these findings, the PAF/PAFR interaction could clarify corresponding mechanisms involved in diabetic complications.