In a study in 75 volunteers, preparations of interferon-beta1b (IFN-beta1b) and IFN-beta1a were compared in terms of the resulting serum concentrations of three biologic markers, neopterin, human Mx protein, and 2',5' oligoadenylate synthetase. Each preparation was tested at five dose levels, the middle dose being that recommended for use in patients with multiple sclerosis on the basis of large clinical trials. Five randomly chosen volunteers each received a single subcutaneous dose of one of the IFN or of IFN-beta1a given intramuscularly. The amounts of each marker induced were dose related. There were no major differences between the results with the two IFN or in the duration of the changes in the markers after the two routes of injection. The data indicated that 8 million international units (MIU) of IFN-beta1b and 6 MIU of IFN-beta1a had very similar effects. Even after the highest single dose tested, the increase in the biologic markers were not sustained for a full week.

No abstract

In a multicenter, double-blind trial, 310 patients who had received a diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder were treated for 6 weeks with either abecarnil, diazepam, or placebo at mean daily doses of 12 mg of abecarnil or 22 mg of diazepam administered three times daily. Patients who were improved at 6 weeks could volunteer to continue double-blind treatment for a total of 24 weeks. The maintenance treatment phase allowed the comparison of taper results for the three treatments at several study periods (0-6 weeks, 7-12 weeks, and more than 12 weeks). Slightly more diazepam (77%) and placebo (75%) patients completed the 6-week study than abecarnil patients (66%). At intake and baseline, after a 1-week placebo washout, the patient was required to have a Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety score of > or =20. Major adverse events for both abecarnil and diazepam were drowsiness, dizziness, fatigue, and coordination difficulties. Clinical improvement data showed that both abecarnil and diazepam produced statistically significantly more symptom relief than did placebo after 1 week of treatment. At 6 weeks treatment (using last observation carried forward analysis), however, only diazepam still differed significantly (p < 0.01) from placebo. High placebo response (56% moderate to marked global improvement) at 6 weeks, as well as a slightly lower nonsignificant improvement rate observed with abecarnil, a partial y-aminobutyric acid (GABA) agonist, when compared with diazepam, a full GABA agonist, most likely contributed to our findings. Finally, taper results showed that only diazepam and not abecarnil caused the presence of temporary discontinuation symptoms, but only in patients who had been treated for at least 12 weeks.

Background Abecarnil, a novel anxiolytic beta-carboline, was investigated in five four-week double-blind, European multicentre studies. Overall, 451 patients with generalised anxiety disorder were randomised to abecarnil, 461 to placebo and 464 to active controls.Method Data includes inferential statistics based on individual studies and descriptive analysis of 323 patients in open-label abecarnil longterm continuation up to 52 weeks.Results Abecarnil was safe, the most frequent adverse event being drowsiness. Onset of effect was at week I. At week 4 the Hamilton Anxiety Scale score had improved by 12–13 points on average. Due to notably large and variable placebo effects abecarnil was not consistently superior to placebo. No rebound or withdrawal symptoms were observed after fast-tapered discontinuation. Safety, extent of efficacy and incidence of rebound or withdrawal did not change during longterm treatment.Conclusions Abecarnil is safe and effective. Further research into its therapeutic potential seems warranted.

No abstract