BackgroundDuring the peak of the Omicron wave, elective laparoscopic surgeries were restricted; however, semiemergency and emergency cases were managed despite the limited resources and manpower. We conducted this study to assess the types of gynaecological laparoscopic surgeries performed, the difficulties faced during the Omicron wave, and how we could implement the lessons learnt from the previous Delta wave for better management of gynaecological cases in the Omicron wave. MethodologyWe conducted a prospective cohort study over a period of three months involving 105 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgeries. Based on the decision regarding surgical incision time, the surgeries were sub-classified into immediate, urgent, and expedited. The surgical outcome and satisfaction rates among the patients were assessed through various parameters. ResultsMost of the women (81.9%) were pre-menopausal. Diabetes and chronic hypertension were the predominant medical co-morbidities. Three patients had a history of cardiac valve replacement which required switching warfarin to unfractionated heparin in the pre-operative period. Nearly three-fourths of the study patients were doubly vaccinated against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (77; 73.4%). A total of 14 (13.3%) patients had a history of COVID-19 infection in the past two weeks prior to the current admission. Immediate, urgent, and expedited surgeries comprised 11.4%, 22.8%, and 65.8% of total surgeries, respectively. On assessing the ease of pre-operative preparation according to the five-point Likert scale, immediate, urgent, and expedited surgeries were rated with a mean score of two, four, and five, respectively. The mean duration of surgery in the immediate and urgent groups was 37.6 and 44.2 minutes, respectively. The expedited group comprising mostly laparoscopic myomectomies and hysterectomies required an average duration of 92.6 minutes. The mean rating of patient satisfaction measured by the Likert scale was four, five, and five, respectively, in the three subgroups. Pre-operative patient preparation during the Omicron wave was faster, thereby decreasing the decision to incision interval compared to the Delta wave. ConclusionsThe lessons learnt from the previous Delta wave were used to modify the existing hospital policies in the Omicron wave. More number of vaccinated ground staff, less stringent intubation and extubation protocols during surgery, and lesser duration of post-operative stay helped modify our existing hospital policies for better patient care and satisfaction.

Background: The modern era has witnessed a transition to a phase of uterus-preserving surgeries and so holds true for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgeries as well. Laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy has become a preferred surgical modality for moderate to severe degrees of POP in most women of the childbearing age group. With the alarming incidences of mesh erosion, synthetic mesh has almost gone off the market. We advocate a very simple and cost-effective technique of laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy using an Ethibond suture graft.Materials and Methods: It was a pilot prospective observational study over one year. Consecutive consenting women with symptomatic prolapsed uterus Stage-II of the central component of the quantitative POP classification (POP-Q) were recruited. Laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy was performed under general anesthesia using the standard protocols, and patients were prospectively followed for six months after surgery. The duration of surgery and hospital stay were noted. Patient satisfaction was rated using a fivepoint Likert scale. The vaginal length was measured immediately after and six months post-surgery. Sexual function was assessed using the validated female sexual function index (FSFI) scale six months after sacrocervicopexy.Results: Out of 28 recruited women, the majority were multiparous, highly qualified, and belonged to the middle socio-economic class. Seven patients had co-morbidity in the form of hypertension (17.8%), diabetes (7.1%), and cardiovascular diseases (7.1%). The mean duration of surgery was 105.8±7.2 minutes in the study population. The mean duration of hospital stay was 2.2±0.6 days. No surgical site infection was noted in any of the cases. Most patients rated "very satisfied" experiences following surgery (67.9%). The mean vaginal length after surgery was 7.6±1.2 centimeters. After a follow-up period of six months, the mean vaginal length was 7.4±0.8 centimeters. The mean FSFI score was 30.8±2.4. Conclusion: Laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy with Ethibond suture graft is a cost-effective and safe surgical technique for POP in resource-limited settings. It also obviates the additional cost of synthetic mesh and the long-term risks of mesh erosion.