Purpose The increasing tendency of chest CT usage throughout the COVID-19 epidemic requires new tools and a systematic scheme for diagnosing and assessing the lung involvement in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). To investigate the use of the COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) classification and chest CT Involvement Score (CT-IS) in COVID-19 pneumonia. Material and methods This retrospective study enrolled 280 hospitalized patients diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia in a tertiary hospital in Turkey. All patients underwent non-contrast CT chest imaging. Two radiologists interpreted all CT images according to CO-RADS classification without knowing the clinical features, laboratory findings. We used CT involvement score (CT-IS) for assessing chest CT images of COVID-19 patients. Also, we examined the relationship between CT-IS and clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients. Results Of the patients, 111(39.6%) had positive real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results. CO-RADS 5 group patients had statistically significant positive RT-PCR results than the other groups (P < 0.001). All of the CO-RADS 2 group patients (30) had negative RT-PCR results. The mean total CT-IS in CO-RADS 2 group was 3.4 ± 2.8. The mean total CT-IS in CO-RADS 5 group was 8.2 ± 4.7. Total CT-IS was statistically significantly different among CO-RADS groups (P < 0.001). The mean total CT-IS was statistically significantly different between survivors and patients died of COVID-19 pneumonia (P < 0.001). Conclusions CO-RADS is useful in detecting COVID-19 disease, even if RT-PCR testing is negative. CT-IS is also helpful as an imaging tool for evaluation of the severity and extent of COVID-19 pneumonia.
Objectives Behcet's disease is a multisystemic, inflammatory disease. Various factors have been implicated in the disease, including genetics, infections, immunoglobulins, immune complexes, antibodies, and oxidative stress. However, the underlying etiopathogenesis remains unclear. Behcet's disease can occur with or without vascular involvement. This prospective study investigated the relationship between the intima-media thickness of the major arteries, in addition to other factors affecting the disease process, in Behcet's disease without vascular involvement. Methods Twenty-four patients (average age: 38.50 ± 10.931) without vascular involvement or any vascular complaints who were diagnosed with Behcet's disease were included in the study. Sixteen healthy subjects (average age: 39.75 ± 7.793) were included as a control group. Demographic information and medical histories were recorded, and routine blood tests were performed in both groups. The intima-media thickness of the subclavian, axillary, femoral, and carotid arteries of all the participants were recorded using Doppler ultrasonography. The data were then subjected to intergroup statistical and correlation analyses. Results There were no significant differences between the arterial intima-media thickness values of the Behcet's disease patients and those of the control group ( p > 0.05). However, there was a significant difference between the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio ( p = 0.004), low-density lipoprotein ( p = 0.007), and triglyceride ( p = 0042) levels of the two groups. Significant correlations were found between intima-media thickness and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio levels ( p = 0.012) and the disease duration ( p = 0.030). There was also a significant correlation between the intima-media thickness of the femoral artery and disease duration ( p = 0.014). Conclusions The results showed that the duration of illness had a significant effect on arterial intima-media thickness in Behcet's disease. Blood neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio levels were also associated with increased intima-media thickness.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.