One of many protein-protein interactions modulated upon DNA damage is that of the single-stranded DNA-binding protein, replication protein A (RPA), with the p53 tumor suppressor. Here we report the crystal structure of RPA residues 1-120 (RPA70N) bound to the N-terminal transactivation domain of p53 (residues 37-57; p53N) and, by using NMR spectroscopy, characterize two mechanisms by which the RPA͞p53 interaction can be modulated. RPA70N forms an oligonucleotide͞oligosaccharide-binding fold, similar to that previously observed for the ssDNA-binding domains of RPA. In contrast, the N-terminal p53 transactivation domain is largely disordered in solution, but residues 37-57 fold into two amphipathic helices, H1 and H2, upon binding with RPA70N. The H2 helix of p53 structurally mimics the binding of ssDNA to the oligonucleotide͞oligosaccharide-binding fold. NMR experiments confirmed that both ssDNA and an acidic peptide mimicking a phosphorylated form of RPA32N can independently compete the acidic p53N out of the binding site. Taken together, our data suggest a mechanism for DNA damage signaling that can explain a threshold response to DNA damage.DNA binding ͉ protein-protein interaction ͉ structural analysis ͉ ssDNA mimicry U pon DNA damage, the p53 tumor suppressor is activated and orchestrates a cellular response by transcriptional regulation of genes involved in cell cycle arrest and apoptosis (1, 2). p53 protein is central to an extensive network of DNA damage sensing proteinprotein and protein-nucleic acid interactions. As yet, however, details of how this network is regulated are unclear. One component of the network is replication protein A (RPA), the major single-stranded (ss) DNA-binding protein of the eukaryotic nucleus (3-5). The interaction of p53 with RPA mediates suppression of homologous recombination (6) and modulates Werner syndrome helicase activity (7). It is also linked with DNA repair and disruption of p53 and RPA complexes after DNA damage is thought to coordinate DNA repair with the p53-dependent checkpoint control (8).Because the ability of p53 to bind specific DNA target sequences via its DNA-binding core (9) (Fig. 1,) is blocked when the protein is complexed with RPA it follows that UV-mediated disruption of the complexes is predicted to favor p53 transactivation functions (10). p53-RPA complex formation is affected by the presence of various lengths of ssDNAs, because RPA, when bound to these ssDNAs, is unable to interact with p53 (10). UV radiation of cells also reduces p53-RPA complexes by a second mechanism, because hyperphosphorylated RPA does not associate with p53 (8). Thus p53-RPA interaction is subject (i) to the presence of ssDNA molecules and also (ii) to the phosphorylation status of the RPA protein.RPA is a heterotrimer (RPA70, RPA32, and RPA14; Fig. 1B) involved in many aspects of DNA metabolism such as replication, recombination, and repair (11,12). The largest subunit, RPA70, is a tandem repeat of four oligonucleotide͞oligosaccharide-binding (OB) folds (13) comprising RPA70...

The p53 tumor suppressor gene and members of the transforming growth factor-␤ (TGF-␤) superfamily play central roles in signaling cell cycle arrest and apoptosis (programmed cell death) in normal development and differentiation, as well as in carcinogenesis. Here we describe a distantly related member of the TGF-␤ superfamily, designated placental TGF-␤ (PTGF-␤), that is upregulated in response to both p53-dependent and -independent apoptotic signaling events arising from DNA damage in human breast cancer cells. PTGF-␤ is normally expressed in placenta and at lower levels in kidney, lung, pancreas, and muscle but could not be detected in any tumor cell line studied. The PTGF-␤ promoter is activated by p53 and contains two p53 binding site motifs. Functional studies demonstrated that one of these p53 binding sites is essential for p53-mediated PTGF-␤ promoter induction and specifically binds recombinant p53 in gel mobility shift assays. PTGF-␤ overexpression from a recombinant adenoviral vector (AdPTGF-␤) led to an 80% reduction in MDA-MB-468 breast cancer cell viability and a 50 -60% reduction in other human breast cancer cell lines studied, including MCF-7 cells, which are resistant to growth inhibition by recombinant wild-type p53. Like p53, PTGF-␤ overexpression was seen to induce both G 1 cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in breast tumor cells. These results provide the first evidence for a direct functional link between p53 and the TGF-␤ superfamily and implicate PTGF-␤ as an important intercellular mediator of p53 function and the cytostatic effects of radiation and chemotherapeutic cancer agents.

No abstract

Mutations in the p53 tumor suppressor gene are the most frequent genetic alterations found in human cancers. Recent identification of two human homologues of p53 has raised the prospect of functional interactions between family members via a conserved oligomerization domain. Here we report in vitro and in vivo analysis of homo-and hetero-oligomerization of p53 and its homologues, p63 and p73. The oligomerization domains of p63 and p73 can independently fold into stable homotetramers, as previously observed for p53. However, the oligomerization domain of p53 does not associate with that of either p73 or p63, even when p53 is in 15-fold excess. On the other hand, the oligomerization domains of p63 and p73 are able to weakly associate with one another in vitro. In vivo co-transfection assays of the ability of p53 and its homologues to activate reporter genes showed that a DNA-binding mutant of p53 was not able to act in a dominant negative manner over wildtype p73 or p63 but that a p73 mutant could inhibit the activity of wild-type p63. These data suggest that mutant p53 in cancer cells will not interact with endogenous or exogenous p63 or p73 via their respective oligomerization domains. It also establishes that the multiple isoforms of p63 as well as those of p73 are capable of interacting via their common oligomerization domain.Tumor suppressor p53 is a transcriptional regulator of genes involved in control of the cell cycle and/or apoptosis (reviewed in Refs. 1-3). In response to cellular stress, particularly DNA damage, p53 protein levels rise, leading to changes in expression of p53 responsive genes and subsequent cell cycle arrest and/or apoptosis. Growth arrest or cell death prevents damaged DNA from being replicated and suggests a role for p53 in maintaining the integrity of the genome (4). This DNA damage checkpoint activity is central to its role as a tumor suppressor and also of major importance in the response of many cancers to conventional therapies that trigger apoptosis by damaging DNA. Inactivation of p53 through deletion, mutation, or interaction with cellular or viral proteins is a key step in over half of all human cancers (5, 6). Reactivation of the p53 pathway leading to apoptosis in cancer cells containing inactive p53 could greatly improve current modes of treatment (7,8) and could potentially be a treatment modality in itself (9, 10).Recently, two p53 homologues have been identified that can activate some of the same target genes as p53 and can induce apoptosis. The existence of these new proteins adds new complexity to our understanding of the p53 pathway and offers new potential for its reactivation in cancer cells. Human p73 (11, 12) and p63 (13-15) share regions of homology with the activation, DNA-binding, and oligomerization domains of p53. This raises the possibility of physical, and/or genetic interactions between p53 family members (13), as is often the case within other families of transcription factors such as the homeodomain proteins (16) or the Myc superfamily (17). Both p63 a...