The eight mammalian Cbx proteins are chromodomain-containing proteins involved in regulation of heterochromatin, gene expression, and developmental programs. They are evolutionarily related to the Drosophila HP1 (dHP1) and Pc (dPc) proteins that are key components of chromatin-associated complexes capable of recognizing repressive marks such as trimethylated Lys-9 and Lys-27, respectively, on histone H3. However, the binding specificity and function of the human homologs, Cbx1–8, remain unclear. To this end we employed structural, biophysical, and mutagenic approaches to characterize the molecular determinants of sequence contextual methyllysine binding to human Cbx1–8 proteins. Although all three human HP1 homologs (Cbx1, -3, -5) replicate the structural and binding features of their dHP counterparts, the five Pc homologs (Cbx2, -4, -6, -7, -8) bind with lower affinity to H3K9me3 or H3K27me3 peptides and are unable to distinguish between these two marks. Additionally, peptide permutation arrays revealed a greater sequence tolerance within the Pc family and suggest alternative nonhistone sequences as potential binding targets for this class of chromodomains. Our structures explain the divergence of peptide binding selectivity in the Pc subfamily and highlight previously unrecognized features of the chromodomain that influence binding and specificity.

One of many protein-protein interactions modulated upon DNA damage is that of the single-stranded DNA-binding protein, replication protein A (RPA), with the p53 tumor suppressor. Here we report the crystal structure of RPA residues 1-120 (RPA70N) bound to the N-terminal transactivation domain of p53 (residues 37-57; p53N) and, by using NMR spectroscopy, characterize two mechanisms by which the RPA͞p53 interaction can be modulated. RPA70N forms an oligonucleotide͞oligosaccharide-binding fold, similar to that previously observed for the ssDNA-binding domains of RPA. In contrast, the N-terminal p53 transactivation domain is largely disordered in solution, but residues 37-57 fold into two amphipathic helices, H1 and H2, upon binding with RPA70N. The H2 helix of p53 structurally mimics the binding of ssDNA to the oligonucleotide͞oligosaccharide-binding fold. NMR experiments confirmed that both ssDNA and an acidic peptide mimicking a phosphorylated form of RPA32N can independently compete the acidic p53N out of the binding site. Taken together, our data suggest a mechanism for DNA damage signaling that can explain a threshold response to DNA damage.DNA binding ͉ protein-protein interaction ͉ structural analysis ͉ ssDNA mimicry U pon DNA damage, the p53 tumor suppressor is activated and orchestrates a cellular response by transcriptional regulation of genes involved in cell cycle arrest and apoptosis (1, 2). p53 protein is central to an extensive network of DNA damage sensing proteinprotein and protein-nucleic acid interactions. As yet, however, details of how this network is regulated are unclear. One component of the network is replication protein A (RPA), the major single-stranded (ss) DNA-binding protein of the eukaryotic nucleus (3-5). The interaction of p53 with RPA mediates suppression of homologous recombination (6) and modulates Werner syndrome helicase activity (7). It is also linked with DNA repair and disruption of p53 and RPA complexes after DNA damage is thought to coordinate DNA repair with the p53-dependent checkpoint control (8).Because the ability of p53 to bind specific DNA target sequences via its DNA-binding core (9) (Fig. 1,) is blocked when the protein is complexed with RPA it follows that UV-mediated disruption of the complexes is predicted to favor p53 transactivation functions (10). p53-RPA complex formation is affected by the presence of various lengths of ssDNAs, because RPA, when bound to these ssDNAs, is unable to interact with p53 (10). UV radiation of cells also reduces p53-RPA complexes by a second mechanism, because hyperphosphorylated RPA does not associate with p53 (8). Thus p53-RPA interaction is subject (i) to the presence of ssDNA molecules and also (ii) to the phosphorylation status of the RPA protein.RPA is a heterotrimer (RPA70, RPA32, and RPA14; Fig. 1B) involved in many aspects of DNA metabolism such as replication, recombination, and repair (11,12). The largest subunit, RPA70, is a tandem repeat of four oligonucleotide͞oligosaccharide-binding (OB) folds (13) comprising RPA70...

The response to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) entails the hierarchical recruitment of proteins orchestrated by ATM-dependent phosphorylation and RNF8-mediated chromatin ubiquitylation. As in most ubiquitin-dependent processes, the ordered accumulation of DNA repair factors at the break site relies on ubiquitin-binding domains (UBDs). However, how UBDs select their ligands is poorly understood, and therefore we sought to uncover the basis for selectivity in the ubiquitin-dependent DSB response. We show that RNF168, its paralog RNF169, RAD18, and the BRCA1-interacting RAP80 protein accumulate at DSB sites through the use of bipartite modules composed of UBDs juxtaposed to peptide motifs that provide specificity. These sequences, named LR motifs (LRMs), are transferable, and we show that the RNF169 LRM2 binds to nucleosomes, the substrates of RNF168. The LRM-based selection of ligands is a parsimonious means to build a highly discrete ubiquitin-based signaling pathway such as the DNA damage response.