Google Scholar was released as a beta product in November of 2004. Since then, Google Scholar has been scrutinized and questioned by many in academia and the library field. Our objectives in undertaking this study were to determine how scholarly Google Scholar is in comparison with traditional library resources and to determine if the scholarliness of materials found in Google Scholar varies across disciplines. We found that Google Scholar is, on average, 17.6 percent more scholarly than materials found only in library databases and that there is no statistically significant difference between the scholarliness of materials found in Google Scholar across disciplines.
This paper examines the case of a large open pit that is being planned at the site of an existing underground mine. Strategic planning work is undertaken to investigate the project value associated with an expansion of underground operations in conjunction with the proposed pit. Previous analysis by mine planners has determined that any depletion of the available open pit resource that changes the optimum pushback sequence will have a significant negative impact on overall project value. As a result, the main objective of this case study is to determine a strategic plan capable of yielding the optimum economic value for a combined undergroundopen pit operation. To investigate the viability of an underground expansion, a system to identify the stope resource that would add value to a combined operation if mined ahead of the pit is required. The main solution to this problem is the use of a resource model variable that defines the blocks which have greater discounted value if mined by stoping rather than by the open pit. From this potential underground resource, a series of mineable stope shells are generated at various cut-offs. This stope reserve data formed the input to an optimisation process used to optimise the underground mining plan, at a conceptual level, for various project configurations. Then, a dynamic programming mathematical program is used to evaluate the optimum value of a combined open pit and underground operation. The results generated in the case study presented herein provide a clear focus and direction for the next level of detailed mine design and planning.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.