3It is now accepted that long duration γ-ray bursts (GRBs) are produced during the collapse of a massive star 1,2 . 11,12 . GRB 060505 was a faint burst with a duration of 4 s. GRB 060614 had a duration of 102 s and a pronounced hard to soft evolution. Both were rapidly localised by Swift's X-ray telescope (XRT). Subsequent follow-up of these bursts led to the discovery of their optical afterglows, locating them in galaxies at low redshift: GRB 060505 at z = 0.089 13 and GRB 060614 at z = 0.125 14,15 . The relative proximity of these bursts engendered an expectation that a bright SN would be discovered a few days after the bursts, as had been found just a few months before in 4 another low-redshift Swift burst, GRB 060218 (z = 0.033) 9 , and in all previous wellobserved nearby bursts 1,5-8 .We monitored the afterglows of GRB 060505 and 060614 using a range of telescopes (see supplementary material for details). These led to early detections of the afterglows. We continued the monitoring campaign and obtained stringent upper limits on any re-brightening at the position of the optical afterglows up to 12 and 5 weeks after the bursts, respectively. The light-curves obtained based on this monitoring are shown in Fig. 1. For GRB 060505 we detected the optical afterglow at a single epoch. All subsequent observations resulted in deep upper limits. For GRB 060614 we followed the decay of the optical afterglow in the R-band up to four nights after the burst. In later observations no source was detected to deep limits (see also 14,15 for independent studies of this event). As seen in Fig. 1, the upper limits are far below the level seen in previous SNe, in particular previous SNe associated with long-duration GRBs 5-9 . For both GRBs A concern in any attempt to uncover a SN associated with a GRB is the presence of a poorly quantified level of extinction along the line of sight. In these cases however,we are fortunate that the levels of Galactic extinction in both directions are very low,. In the case of GRB 060505, our spatially resolved spectroscopy of the host galaxy allows us to use the Balmer emission line ratios to limit the dust obscuration 5 at the location of the burst. The Balmer line ratio is consistent with no internal reddening. In the case of GRB 060614, the detection of the early afterglow in many bands, including the Swift UV bands UVW1 and UVW2 17 , rules out significant obscuration of the source in the host galaxy and we conclude that there is no significant dust obscuration in either case (see also 15 ).Both GRBs were located in star-forming galaxies. The host galaxy of GRB 060505 has an absolute magnitude of about M B = -19.6 and the spectrum displays the prominent emission lines typically seen in star-forming galaxies. The 2-dimensional spectrum shows that the host galaxy emission seen at the position of the afterglow is due to a compact H II region in a spiral arm of the host (see the supplementary material for details). We estimate a star-formation rate of 1 M  yr −1 and a specific rate of about 4T...

15131514 KANN ET AL.Vol. 720 ABSTRACT We have gathered optical photometry data from the literature on a large sample of Swift-era gamma-ray burst (GRB) afterglows including GRBs up to 2009 September, for a total of 76 GRBs, and present an additional three pre-Swift GRBs not included in an earlier sample. Furthermore, we publish 840 additional new photometry data points on a total of 42 GRB afterglows, including large data sets for GRBs 050319, 050408, 050802, 050820A, 050922C, 060418, 080413A, and 080810. We analyzed the light curves of all GRBs in the sample and derived spectral energy distributions for the sample with the best data quality, allowing us to estimate the host-galaxy extinction. We transformed the afterglow light curves into an extinction-corrected z = 1 system and compared their luminosities with a sample of pre-Swift afterglows. The results of a former study, which showed that GRB afterglows clustered and exhibited a bimodal distribution in luminosity space, are weakened by the larger sample. We found that the luminosity distribution of the two afterglow samples (Swift-era and pre-Swift) is very similar, and that a subsample for which we were not able to estimate the extinction, which is fainter than the main sample, can be explained by assuming a moderate amount of line-of-sight host extinction. We derived bolometric isotropic energies for all GRBs in our sample, and found only a tentative correlation between the prompt energy release and the optical afterglow luminosity at 1 day after the GRB in the z = 1 system. A comparative study of the optical luminosities of GRB afterglows with echelle spectra (which show a high number of foreground absorbing systems) and those without, reveals no indication that the former are statistically significantly more luminous. Furthermore, we propose the existence of an upper ceiling on afterglow luminosities and study the luminosity distribution at early times, which was not accessible before the advent of the Swift satellite. Most GRBs feature afterglows that are dominated by the forward shock from early times on. Finally, we present the first indications of a class of long GRBs, which form a bridge between the typical highluminosity, high-redshift events and nearby low-luminosity events (which are also associated with spectroscopic supernovae) in terms of energetics and observed redshift distribution, indicating a continuous distribution overall.

No abstract

Low-resolution spectroscopy of gamma-ray burst optical afterglows: Biases in the swift sample and characterization of the absorbers http:

only 70 ms long, with peak energy of 83 keV, followed ~30 s later by fainter and softer emission from the same location, detected only at energies below 10 keV and lasting for about 2 min. This later component, speculated to be due to afterglow emission 9 , allowed HETE-2's Soft X-ray Camera (SXC) to obtain a source location with an 81-arcsec error radius.