We conclude that: (1) bone loss following tibial shaft fracture occurs both proximal and distal to the fracture; (2) the decreased BMD is largest for trabecular bone in the tibia with similar measurements using DXA and pQCT; (3) there is limited recovery of bone lost at the hip and tibia at 1 year; (4) tibial speed of sound (SOS) demonstrated a greater decrease than calcaneal SOS when comparing z -scores; (5) BUA is the QUS variable that shows the biggest decrease of bone mass at the calcaneus; (6) increase in bone turnover occurs following fracture with an earlier increase in bone resorption markers and a later rise in bone formation markers.

Bone loss occurs close to a fracture and is associated with increased bone turnover. Fracture healing itself results in increased markers of bone turnover. But the exact patterns of these changes after different fractures are unclear. We aimed to investigate the changes in bone density and biochemical markers following distal forearm fracture. Twenty women (mean age 63 years) were recruited following fracture of the distal radius and ulna. Bone mineral density (BMD) of the hand and forearm were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the fingers was measured at 0, 6, 12, 26 and 52 weeks after fracture. Serum and urine samples were collected at 0, 3 and 7 days and at 2, 4, 6, 12, 26 and 52 weeks after fracture to measure markers of bone turnover. For bone formation we measured: bone alkaline phosphatase (iBAP), osteocalcin (Oc), procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP); and for bone resorption: tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAcP), free deoxypyridinoline (iFDpd), N-telopeptides of type I collagen (NTx). We used the nonfractured limb to calculate values for baseline BMD and amplitude-dependent speed of sound (AD-SoS). There was a decrease in BMD at the hand and in AD-SoS of the fingers after forearm fracture (p<0.001). This bone loss was maximal for BMD by 6 weeks at 9% (p<0. 001) and remained decreased at 52 weeks. AD-SoS decreased at 12 weeks by 3% (p<0.01) and recovered completely by 52 weeks. Bone formation markers increased between 2 and 4 weeks by 13-52% (p<0. 001), and were still elevated at 52 weeks. Bone resorption markers increased between 2 and 6 weeks by 18-35% and returned to baseline at 52 weeks (TRAcP remained elevated). We conclude that BMD decreased distal and immediately proximal to the fracture line when measured with DXA and QUS. Bone loss after distal forearm fracture did not recover by 52 weeks and most bone turnover markers did not return to baseline.

Bone loss and increased bone turnover are recognized local changes after a fracture, but the exact patterns of these changes after different fractures are unclear. We aimed to investigate the changes in bone density and biochemical markers following ankle fracture. Fourteen subjects (7 postmenopausal women and 7 men, mean age 63 years) were recruited following fracture of the distal tibia and fibula. Bone mineral density (BMD) of the ankle and proximal femur were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the calcaneus at 0, 6, 12, 26 and 52 weeks after fracture. Serum and urine samples were collected at 0, 3 and 7 days and at 2, 4, 6, 12, 26 and 52 weeks after fracture to measure markers of bone turnover. For bone formation we measured: bone alkaline phosphatase (iBAP), osteocalcin (Oc), procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP); and for bone resorption: tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAcP), deoxypyridinoline (iFDpd), N-telopeptides of type I collagen (NTx). We used the nonfractured limb to calculate values for baseline BMD and QUS. There was a significant decrease in BMD at the ultradistal ankle (p<0.001), the trochanteric region of the hip (p<0.01) and QUS of the heel after ankle fracture. This bone loss was maximal for ultradistal ankle BMD by 6 weeks at 13% (p<0.001) and for the trochanter by 26 weeks at 3% (p<0.01). The ankle BMD returned to baseline at 52 weeks but the trochanter BMD did not. Velocity of sound (VOS) decreased at 6 weeks by 2% (p<0.01) and broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) by 15% (p<0.01). VOS recovered completely by 52 weeks, but BUA did not return to baseline. Bone formation markers increased significantly between 1 and 4 weeks by 11-78% (p<0.01), and iBAP returned to baseline at 52 weeks but PINP and Oc remained elevated. Bone resorption markers did not increase and NTx was decreased at 52 weeks. We conclude that BMD decreased distal and immediately proximal to the fracture line when measured with DXA and QUS. Ankle BMD and heel VOS recovered at 52 weeks (trochanteric BMD and heel BUA did not) and the bone turnover markers returned toward baseline.

Delayed union and non-union are common complications after fracture of the tibial shaft. Response of the surrounding bone as a fracture heals could be monitored using techniques currently used in the study of osteoporosis. The aims of our study were to: (1) evaluate the decrement in bone measurements made close to the fracture using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), quantitative ultrasound (QUS) and peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT); (2) compare values for fractured versus non-fractured leg to determine the duration of decrement in bone measurements; and (3) calculate short-term precision in DXA, QUS and pQCT in order to calculate the ratio of decrement to precision (response ratio, RR) to determine the optimal test for monitoring changes after tibial fracture. The biggest decrement in bone measurements at the ipsilateral limb of 28 patients with tibial shaft fracture was observed at the pQCT tibial trabecular sites (distal = 19%, p<0.0001; proximal 5% = 21%, p<0.001; proximal 10% = 28%, p<0.001) and the ultradistal tibia/fibula measured by DXA (19%, p<0.0001). When comparing Z-scores, the magnitude of decrements at the ipsilateral limb was bigger for variables measured directly at the tibia, both proximal and distal to the fracture. The magnitude of the decrement in ultradistal tibia/fibula BMD decreased as the time since fracture increased ( r = 0.55). When response ratios are considered, pQCT measurements at the distal tibia (RR 6-8) and proximal 5% and 10% trabecular sites (RR 5 and 9 respectively) were found to be the most sensitive to change. Therefore, pQCT of the trabecular regions of either the proximal or distal tibia should prove the most sensitive measurement for monitoring changes in bone adjacent to a tibial shaft fracture.

No abstract