Background. Breast conservation is now established treatment for patients with small breast cancers. The authors reviewed a large series of patients with long term follow‐up who underwent conservative treatment. Clinical and pathologic factors were analyzed to identify patients at an increased risk of relapse in the breast (local relapse) or development of a contralateral tumor.
Methods. Seven hundred fifty‐seven patients with unilateral invasive breast cancer (T0‐2, N0‐1, M0) were treated conservatively (wide local excision and radio‐therapy) at the Institut Gustave‐Roussy between 1970 and 1982. The median follow‐up was 9 years. The risk of local relapse or development of a contralateral tumor (as first event) was studied by univariate analysis for the main clinical, pathologic, and treatment factors. Those found to be significant were entered into a Cox proportional regression analysis.
Results. Fifty‐one patients relapsed in the treated breast (actuarial local relapse rates at 5 and 10 years were 5% and 8%, respectively) and 34 in the contralateral breast (actuarial contralateral tumor rates at 5 and 10 years were 3% and 6%, respectively). Multivariate analysis of the risk factors for local relapse showed that only age younger than 40 years (P < 0.02) or inadequate surgical excision (P < 0.02) were significant. No particular risk factors for contralateral tumor development were identified.
Conclusions. Overall, for most patients, the risk of local relapse or of developing a contralateral tumor was low. A small number of young patients with inadequately excised tumors are at higher risk of local relapse, need more meticulous surgery, and may merit higher dose radiotherapy. Cancer 1995;76:2260–5.
In a prospective, randomized, multicenter study, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) with carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) followed by locoregional treatment (LRT) was compared with locoregional treatment alone in the treatment of patients with head and neck cancer. This study, which includes 324 patients, was conducted from January 1988 to July 1991. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the carboplatin/5-FU regimen both on the incidence of mutilating surgery and on the survival rate. Chemotherapy consisted of three cycles of carboplatin 400 mg/m2 day 1 and 5-FU 1 g/m2 days 1-5, repeated every 3 weeks. Patients with a complete tumor response then received radiotherapy alone, instead of the treatment planned initially. Three hundred patients were analyzed: 79 had tumors of the oral cavity, 106 oropharyngeal tumors, and 115 pharyngolaryngeal tumors. One hundred fifty patients underwent CT+LRT; 150 patients had LRT alone. Grade 3 and 4 toxicity rates were minimal in the CT+LRT group; toxicity was mainly hematologic (24% neutropenia, 19% thrombocytopenia). There were 3 toxic deaths (2%), 2 due to septicemia and 1 due to cardiac toxicity. One hundred forty-three patients were evaluable for efficacy. The tumor objective response rate was 63% and complete response rate was 31% (35% for oropharyngeal, 34% for pharyngolaryngeal tumors, 22.5% for oral cavity tumors), which led to a 29% decrease in the rate of mutilating surgery. Conservative treatment was performed in 57% of patients in the CT+LRT group vs. 24% in the LRT group (p = 0.001). There was no significant difference between survival curves in the CT+LRT and LRT groups. At 4 years, overall survival rates were 56 and 46%; disease-free survival rates were 33 and 30% in the CT+LRT and the LRT groups, respectively. The survival rates were not significantly different in the two groups. The locoregional recurrence rates were 35% in the CT+LRT arm and 25% in the LRT arm (p = 0.04), with median follow-up of 25 months. The rates of secondary localization and distant metastasis were not significantly different in the two groups.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.