The aim of the study was to determine if tumor seeding during laparoscopic surgery for cancer is a rare event or a typical complication of this procedure. Laparoscopic staging and treatment of intraabdominal tumors is increasing in gastroenterology, gynecology, and general surgery. A total of 1052 questionnaires were mailed to surgical department chairmen, members of the German Society of Surgery, Swiss Association for Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery, and Austrian Society of Minimal Invasive Surgery asking them to list their department's experience with tumor seeding after laparoscopy for nonapparent or known malignancy. There were 607 (57.7%) surgeons who reported a total of 117,840 laparoscopic cholecystectomies, 409 incidental gallbladder carcinomas, and 412 laparoscopies on patients with colorectal carcinoma. Altogether 109 patients who developed tumor recurrence in connection with laparoscopic surgery have been reported. Port-site recurrence was identified in 70 of 409 patients (17.1%) with a median of 180 days following laparoscopic cholecystectomy for nonapparent gallbladder carcinoma. In 8 cases (11.5%) a protective plastic bag had been used for gallbladder retrieval. Six patients without port-site metastases were found to have a diffuse peritoneal carcinomatosis a median of 120 days after cholecystectomy. Of 412 laparoscopies for colorectal cancer, 19 cases (4.6%) of tumor seeding have been reported, 16 of which (3.9%) had documented port-site and scar recurrences a median of 196 days after laparoscopy. The tumor specimen was intact, and a plastic bag was used for extraction in seven cases. In 14 patients trocar-site metastases have been reported a median of 70 days after laparoscopy for different nonapparent or known malignancies. The probability of developing abdominal wall metastasis is higher after laparoscopy for cancer than after open surgery. An intact surgical specimen and the use of a plastic retrieval bag do not exclude the risk of port-site recurrences. These facts and the early appearance of peritoneal carcinosis in a few cases of intraabdominal malignancies seem to confirm a specific laparoscopic risk for intraperitoneal tumor cell seeding and implantation.

Port site metastasis has been a surprising event after laparoscopic procedures in cancer patients. No clear data exist about this phenomenon. The aim of this study is to summarize current epidemiologic knowledge about the risk of this complication. A review of all case reports about port site recurrences was undertaken. To date, 164 cases of port site metastases after videoscopic procedures have been reported in 90 papers. We found 108 cases of implantation after laparoscopy for digestive tumors, 23 after thoracoscopy, 29 after gynecological and 4 after urological laparoscopy. Analysis of the current literature confirms that laparoscopy is associated with abdominal cell mobilization to the trocars and instruments. Also low-staged and highly differentiated tumors have been reported to cause post-laparoscopy tumor seeding. The temporary data of the CAE registry ‘port site metastases’ (Workgroup for Surgical Endoscopy of the German Society of Surgery) are also reported. The analysis of 80 histologically confirmed cases of port site recurrence shows a particular frequency after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for unsuspected gallbladder cancer (n = 59). Postoperative specimen examination revealed a T1 carcinoma in 9 cases (15%), T2 carcinoma in 33 (21%), T3 in 3 (5%) and T4 in 1 case (1.7%). The mean time to clinical tumor relapse was 6 months. Similar patterns were found in a lower number of port site metastases after laparoscopy for colon cancer (n = 2) and for other cancers (n = 9).Clinical evidence that laparoscopy with CO₂ pneumoperitoneum can enhance tumor dissemination is given. Port site metastases seem to be secondary to multiple factors including the gas used, local trauma, tumor manipulation, biologic properties of the tumor, and individual surgical skills.

In adult patients, laparoscopic surgery, using a robot system (Da Vinci, Intuitive Surgical, Mountain View, California), has been recently introduced into surgical practice. To investigate the feasibility of the system in paediatric surgery, laparoscopic fundoplications as well as cholecystectomies have been performed. In July 2000 we used the robot system for the first time on an 11-year-old girl with gastro-oesophageal reflux, and since that time on 7 other children. Altogether 5 Thal and 3 Nissen procedures have been carried out. The average age was 12 years, with a range of 7 to 16 years. All operations were performed without complications and without conversion to open surgery. The medium operating time was 146 min with a range of 105 to 180 minutes. Compared to conventional laparoscopy, the 3-dimensional high-quality vision, the advanced instrument movements and the ergonomic position of the surgeon seems to enhance surgical precision. In our opinion, the use of the robot system is feasible and safe in paediatric surgery. The technique is limited due to the fact that instruments adapted to the size of small children are not yet available.

Pneumoperitoneum, as a necessary precondition of laparoscopic procedures, represents a restriction of the surgeon's freedom of movement and can lead to rare but typical complications. We describe our first experiences with laparoscopic surgery without using pneumoperitoneum. Under direct vision and digital control a fan-formed wall retractor, which is attached to an electric lift arm, is introduced into the abdominal cavity. After raising the abdominal wall, the scope is introduced through the same access and the laparoscopic procedure can be started without the technical and physiopathological problems which may occur using a pneumoperitoneum. In this gasless laparoscopic procedure, simple valveless trocars and instruments can be used. Furthermore, an unlimited suction can be obtained without a loss of exposure. During anesthesia, neither increased ventilation nor increased ventilation pressure is necessary, and the surgeon has increased freedom of action. Not only special laparoscopic instruments, but the conventional instruments, used in open surgery, can also be employed in gasless laparoscopy. In this way we performed gasless laparoscopic surgery on 54 patients: cholecystectomy (n = 37), abdominal exploration for NSAP (n = 5) or tumor staging (n = 4), fenestration of liver cysts (n = 5), and appendectomy (n = 3). We did observe three wound infections as related complications. Six times, we had to change the surgical procedure. Compared to the traditional procedure with a CO2 pneumoperitoneum, the results of the first gasless procedures demonstrate potential advantages.

No abstract