Background: Although providing excellent outcome results, laparoscopy also induces particular pathophysiological changes in response to pneumoperitoneum. Knowledge of the pathophysiology of a CO₂ pneumoperitoneum can help minimize complications while profiting from the benefits of laparoscopic surgery without concerns about its safety. Methods: A review of articles on the pathophysiological changes and complications of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum as well as prevention and treatment of these complications was performed using the Medline database. Results: The main pathophysiological changes during CO₂ pneumoperitoneum refer to the cardiovascular system and are mainly correlated with the amount of intra-abdominal pressure in combination with the patient’s position on the operating table. These changes are well tolerated even in older and more debilitated patients, and except for a slight increase in the incidence of cardiac arrhythmias, no other significant cardiovascular complications occur. Although there are important pulmonary pathophysiological changes, hypercarbia, hypoxemia and barotraumas, they would develop rarely since effective ventilation monitoring and techniques are applied. The alteration in splanchnic perfusion is proportional with the increase in intra-abdominal pressure and duration of pneumoperitoneum. Conclusion: A moderate-to-low intra-abdominal pressure (<12 mm Hg) can help limit the extent of the pathophysiological changes since consecutive organ dysfunctions are minimal, transient and do not influence the outcome.

The aim of the study was to determine if tumor seeding during laparoscopic surgery for cancer is a rare event or a typical complication of this procedure. Laparoscopic staging and treatment of intraabdominal tumors is increasing in gastroenterology, gynecology, and general surgery. A total of 1052 questionnaires were mailed to surgical department chairmen, members of the German Society of Surgery, Swiss Association for Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery, and Austrian Society of Minimal Invasive Surgery asking them to list their department's experience with tumor seeding after laparoscopy for nonapparent or known malignancy. There were 607 (57.7%) surgeons who reported a total of 117,840 laparoscopic cholecystectomies, 409 incidental gallbladder carcinomas, and 412 laparoscopies on patients with colorectal carcinoma. Altogether 109 patients who developed tumor recurrence in connection with laparoscopic surgery have been reported. Port-site recurrence was identified in 70 of 409 patients (17.1%) with a median of 180 days following laparoscopic cholecystectomy for nonapparent gallbladder carcinoma. In 8 cases (11.5%) a protective plastic bag had been used for gallbladder retrieval. Six patients without port-site metastases were found to have a diffuse peritoneal carcinomatosis a median of 120 days after cholecystectomy. Of 412 laparoscopies for colorectal cancer, 19 cases (4.6%) of tumor seeding have been reported, 16 of which (3.9%) had documented port-site and scar recurrences a median of 196 days after laparoscopy. The tumor specimen was intact, and a plastic bag was used for extraction in seven cases. In 14 patients trocar-site metastases have been reported a median of 70 days after laparoscopy for different nonapparent or known malignancies. The probability of developing abdominal wall metastasis is higher after laparoscopy for cancer than after open surgery. An intact surgical specimen and the use of a plastic retrieval bag do not exclude the risk of port-site recurrences. These facts and the early appearance of peritoneal carcinosis in a few cases of intraabdominal malignancies seem to confirm a specific laparoscopic risk for intraperitoneal tumor cell seeding and implantation.

All clinical studies and most of the experimental studies found a reduction of adhesion formation after laparoscopic surgery compared to open surgery.

Concepts in "fast-track" surgery, which provide optimal perioperative care, have been proven to significantly reduce complication rates and decrease hospital stay. This study explores whether fast-track concepts can also be safely applied and improve the outcomes of major pancreatic resections. Perioperative data from 255 consecutive patients, who underwent pancreatic resection by means of fast-track surgery in a high-volume medical center, were analyzed using univariate and multivariate models. Of the 255 patients, 180 received a pancreatic head resection and 51 received distal, 15 received total, and 9 received segmental pancreatectomies. The patients were discharged on median day 10 with a 30-day readmission rate of 3.5%. The in-hospital mortality was 2%, whereas medical and surgical morbidities were 17 and 25%, respectively. Fast-track parameters, such as first stools, normal food, complete mobilization, and return to normal ward, correlated significantly with early discharge (p < 0.05). Patients' age, operation time, and early extubation proved to be independent factors of early discharge, shown through multivariate analysis (odds ratio: 4.0, 2.0, and 2.8, respectively; p < 0.05). Low readmission, mortality, and morbidity rates demonstrate that fast-track surgery is in fact feasible and safe and promotes earlier discharge without compromising patient outcomes.

In comparison with CLF, operative time can be shorter for RALF if performed by an experienced team. However, costs are higher and short-term outcome is similar. Thus, RALF can not be favoured over CLF regarding perioperative outcome.