Consumers' perception of food safety risk could influence their food consumption habits. This questionnaire-based (n = 327) cross-sectional study assessed consumers' attitudes about and perception of retail meat risk. Also, the hygiene of meat display tables (n = 105) and retail meat (n = 107) sold to consumers was determined using total aerobic plate count and total coliform count.Most respondents were single (82.6%) and had tertiary educational status (89.3%). Most of the respondents preferred beef (60.9%) over other meat types and made purchases from retailers (71.3%). Overall, the risk perception score on retail meat safety reported by respondents was above average (56%, n = 83), although consumers (53.8%, n = 176) declared that meat consumption is worth the risk. Meat source (χ 2 = 16.65, P = 0.034) and processed meat products (χ 2 = 28.22, P = 0.005) were associated with food safety risk.Respondents opined that meat processors (weighted mean = 3.85%) could influence food safety. The freshness of meat (weighted mean = 2.54%) was the main criterion used by consumers to determine retail meat safety.Sampled meat and meat display tables had high total aerobic counts (>8 log) and total coliform counts (>5 log).These results are indicators of consumers' risk perception and preferences; the observed microbial loads highlight the need for improved hygiene practices associated with meat sold to consumers in Nigeria.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.