Összefoglaló. Bevezetés: Az emberi sziklacsont a halántékcsont része, egy bonyolult és változatos anatómiai felépítésű struktúra. A sziklacsonton végzett beavatkozások előtt, a műtéti szövődmények megelőzése érdekében, nélkülözhetetlen a biztos anatómiai tudás és kézügyesség megszerzése, valamint az egyes műtéti lépések és mozdulatok begyakorlása. A VOXEL-MAN Tempo 3D fül-orr-gégészeti szimulátor a virtuális valóság és a robotika alkalmazásával nyújt gyakorlási lehetőséget. Célkitűzés: A Szegedi Tudományegyetem 2019-ben VOXEL-MAN fül-orr-gégészeti szimulátort helyezett üzembe az Orvosi Készségfejlesztési Központban. A cikk fül-orr-gégész szakorvos szerzői a VOXEL-MAN Tempo szimulátor megismerését követően bemutatják a készüléket, és megfogalmazzák a szimulátorral végzett beavatkozásokkal szemben támasztott igényüket. Módszer: A szerzők a megfogalmazott szempontoknak megfelelően értékelik a VOXEL-MAN Tempo szimulátort, és meghatározzák, milyen szerepet szánnak neki a gyakorlati képzésben. Eredmények: A szimulátor virtuálisan, mégis valósághűen mutatja meg a sziklacsont anatómiai viszonyait, a fontos anatómiai struktúrák valós térbeli elhelyezkedését és egymástól, illetve a sebészi eszköztől mért távolságát. A rendszer lehetővé teszi a fülműtétek valósághű elvégzését (kétkezes csontmunka fúróval és szívóval, vérzés szimulálása) taktilis visszacsatolással. Az egy- vagy kétkezes feladatokkal fejleszthetjük a sebészi készségeket. A fülműtétek csontmunkája reprodukálható módon elvégezhető valódi beteg halántékcsontjáról készített rutin, nagy felbontású komputertomográfiás vizsgálat anyagából. Következtetés: Tapasztalataink alapján a szimulátor kiválóan alkalmas az egyes műtéti lépesek begyakorlására. A jövőben fontos szerepet szánunk a virtuális rendszernek a fül-orr-gégészeti graduális és a fülsebészeti posztgraduális képzésben. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(16): 623–628. Summary. Introduction: The pars petrosa of the human temporal bone is a structure of complex and diverse anatomy. Prior to surgical interventions, in order to prevent surgical complications, it is essential to acquire sound anatomical knowledge and dexterity as well as to practice each surgical step and movement. The VOXEL-MAN Tempo 3D simulator uses virtual reality and robotics to provide an opportunity to practice. Objective: In 2019, the University of Szeged installed a VOXEL-MAN Virtual Reality simulator at the Medical Skills Development Center. After learning about the VOXEL-MAN Tempo simulator, the authors present the device and articulate their need for interventions with the simulator. Method: The VOXEL-MAN Tempo simulator is evaluated according to the formulated criteria and the role assigned to it in the practical training is determined. Results: The simulator shows the anatomical structure of the temporal bone virtually, yet realistically, the real spatial location of the important anatomical structures and their distance from each other and from the surgical instrument. The system allows ear surgery to be performed realistically (two-handed bone work with a drill and suction) with tactile (vibration) and visual (bleeding) feedback. One can improve surgical skills with one- or two-handed tasks. Bone work in ear surgeries can be performed in a reproducible manner from routine, high-resolution computer tomography of the temporal bone of a real patient. Conclusion: With reference to our experience, the simulator is excellent for practicing each surgical step. In the future, we intend to use this virtual system in undergraduate and postgraduate training in otolaryngology. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(16): 623–628.
Introduction: The cochlear implants vary in electrodes in terms of length, width and proximity to the modiolus. The precurved electrode arrays could be placed closer to the modiolus and the ganglion cells compared to straight electrodes. The two types of electrode arrays provide different electrophysiological characteristics; however, proximity to the modiolus may lead to better hearing performance. Aim: To investigate our preliminary electrophysiological results that suggest that the Slim Modiolar (SM) electrode array has the potential to elicit similar neural responses as the thicker perimodiolar (Contour Advance, CA) electrode from the same generation of implants. Method: Subjects that were implanted either with CA or SM electrodes were enrolled, 54 consecutive subjects in each group. All electrodes were introduced into the cochlea via the round window. The diameter of the largest turn of the electrode arrays within the cochlea was measured through postoperative radiography. The energy consumption parameters were estimated 2 months after implantation. Results: The mean of the largest turns of the arrays within the cochlea was 4.2 ± 0.5 mm in the SM group and 4.9 ± 1.1 mm in the CA group. ‘Auto power’ was 44.81 ± 5.05% and 50.85 ± 8.35% with SM and CA, respectively. Estimated energy consumption was lower with SM. The differences were statistically significant. Conclusion: Our measurements for a large cohort in each group suggest that the SM electrode array takes a significantly closer position to the modiolus than the CA. This finding supports our earlier electrophysiological result and indicates better performance abilities. Orv Hetil. 2019; 160(31): 1216–1222.
During the rehabilitation of hearing-impaired patients, the preservation of residual acoustic hearing following cochlear implantation by minimizing the implantation trauma allows for improved hearing performance. To achieve this, minimally invasive, soft surgery methods and thinner, atraumatic electrodes were required. In our present study, we reported a case where Cochlear® Nucleus CI532 Slim Modiolar electrode was implanted in a patient with residual hearing. Our aim was to study the possible preservation of postoperative acoustic residual hearing by audiological monitoring. Since childhood, due to her congenital hearing loss, she has been wearing a conventional, airborne hearing correction device on both ears. Six months before cochlear implantation, we measured the progression on both sides of the hearing loss, so we decided to perform cochlear implantation. The patient had residual hearing on both ears prior to surgery thus the Cochlear® Nucleus CI532 Slim Modiolar Implant was used. The minimally invasive surgery was performed on the patient’s right ear through the round window approach. Compared to the preoperative hearing threshold (average 85 dBHL) in the 4th postoperative week, an initial hearing threshold progression of 20–25 dBHL was observed between 0.25 and 1.0 kHz, while of 5–10 dBHL between 2.0–4.0 kHz. Hearing threshold measured in the 6th month showed a slight progression in the range above 1 kHz, but improved by the 12th month, to the results achieved at the 4th week. The effects of cochlear implantation on residual hearing have been studied in numerous studies, in which several key surgical and technical factors have been identified. Nucleus CI532 is a Slim Modiolar electrode profile that is close to the modiolus, so it is expected to have a lower endocochlear hydrodynamic load since it lies in the covering of the osseus spiral lamina, thus less influencing the dynamics of the basilar membrane. However, the perimodiolar location of the electrode array allows the adjacent nerve elements of the spiral ganglion to be stimulated with a lower electrical intensity and a reduced surface that may be neuroprotective. Preservation of acoustic residual hearing following cochlear implantation improves the patient’s speech perception and the sound localization skills, particularly in difficult circumstances. Long-term residual hearing preservation may also be of great importance in the subsequent feasibility for regenerative procedures and drug treatments. Orv Hetil. 2018; 159(41): 1680–1688.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.