Establishment of the Constitutional Court marks a new era in the power of the judiciary system in Indonesia. Some areas that had not been touched (Untouchables) by law, such as judicial review issues on the Constitution, can now be done by the Constitutional Court, including the authority, other authority provided for in the 1945 Constitution after the amendment. Besides, the existence of the Constitutional Court must also be equipped with a clear organizational structure, adequate procedural  law, legal principles and sources of law that the Constitutional Court made reference in carrying out its duties and judicial authority. The emergence of the Constitutional Court as a principal judicial authorities are expected to become entry points which promote the establishment of a modern system of judicial authority in Indonesia.

No abstract

The implementation of group representative accusation especially for legal standing in the practice ofjudge in Indonesia is still faced with the handicaps procedural technically. The regulation oflegislation isstill restricted in law material, while in formal law (the court ofjustice) is not regulated clearly. The uncertain ofprocedure informal law (the court of justice) in its regulation is really not the handicaps for thejudge for taking thejust deci sion, because thejudge can apply the otherlaw resource. Although, it has been issued PERMA No. 1 the year 2002 that regulate the group representative accusation, for the next it should be formulated strictly in the new Justice Court of Code Procedures. The group representative accusation is the moresimple justice alternative, quick and low cost.

This research is focused on the impact of globalization within the justice, welfare, and democracy, as well as to the question about what kind of law that is possible to create the justice and the welfare in the middle of democracy crisis is and also the question about how to apply that in Indonesia's court. This study uses socio-legal approach which is mainly committing a quantitative method, based on the literature data. By using socio-legal approach, this study will conduct two kind approaches, which are social and normative juridical. This research makes claim that the globalization has finally made an impact to the happen of economy discriminatory and the widen case of poverty. Poverty will lead a bad impact to the democracy. In a situation of elitist legislation product, the settlement of law that is based on the legalpositivism tradition, it will give impact to the spread of discrimination and poverty. Because of it, in the middle of elitism legislation product, the progressive application of law can be considered as the alternative way to bring out the justice and the welfare for the people. The practice of Indonesia's court has shown its development to the law's progressive movement, nevertheless, the legal-positivism mainstream is still laid on several judges. AbstrakPenelitian ini difokuskan pada dampak globalisasi terhadap keadilan, kesejahteraan dan demokrasi serta konsep hukum yang bagaimanakah yang lebih memungkinkan untuk mewujudkan keadilan dan kesejahteraan rakyat di tengah krisis demokrasi dan bagaimanakah pelaksanaan dalam praktik pengadilan di Indonesia. Metode yang digunakan dalam studi ini adalah socio-legal approach yang bersifat kualitatif, berdasarkan data kepustakaan. Dengan pendekatan socio-legal approach, studi ini menggunakan dua pendekatan, yaitu pendekatan sosial dan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan globalisasi telah mengakibatkan terjadinya kesenjangan (ketidakadilan) ekonomi dan meluasnya kemiskinan. Kemiskinan akan berdampak buruk terhadap demokrasi. Dalam situasi produk legislasi yang elitis, maka penerapan hukum yang didasarkan pada tradisi legal-positivism, akan semakin memperluas ketidakadilan dan kemiskinan. Karena, itu, di tengah situasi produk legislasi yang elitis, penerapan hukum secara progresif, merupakan cara alternatif yang lebih memungkinkan untuk mewujudkan keadilan dan kesejahteraan rakyat. Praktik pengadilan di Indonesia, menunjukkan mulai berkembangnya cara-cara penerapan hukum yang progresif, namun tradisi legal-positivism masih menjadi mainstream para hakim.

The role of Judicial Commission in enforcing law has not been optimal, especially in conducting its function and authority to conduct external supervision of judges. The problem addressed in this research is what effort should be done to strengthen the role of Judicial Commission for law enforcement in Indonesia. The approach used in this research is juridical normative, and data source in this research is secondary data, which are primary, secondary, tertiary law material. Furthermore, the law material is analyzed descriptively and qualitatively. The research result shows that Judicial Commission needs to strengthen its role in enforcing law through the effort in: a. accelerating the revision of responsive and visionary Law of Judicial Commission; b. strengthening the role of institutional; c. strengthening institution in conducting external supervision, both preventively and repressively; d. reforming regulation in the field of justice in order to harmonize and synchronize the laws of Judicial Power, Supreme Court, Constitutional Court and the Judicial Commission; and e. strengthening and arranging its organization and personnel.