The entry of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) into biologically relevant epithelial and endothelial cells involves endocytosis followed by low-pH-dependent fusion. This entry pathway is facilitated by the HCMV UL128, UL130, and UL131 proteins, which form one or more complexes with the virion envelope glycoprotein gH/gL. gH/gL/UL128-131 complexes appear to be distinct from the gH/gL/gO complex, which likely facilitates entry into fibroblasts. In order to better understand the assembly and protein-protein interactions of gH/gL/ UL128-131 complexes, we generated HCMV mutants lacking UL128-131 proteins and nonreplicating adenovirus vectors expressing gH, gL, UL128, UL130, and UL131. Our results demonstrate that UL128, UL130, and UL131 can each independently assemble onto gH/gL scaffolds. However, the binding of individual UL128-131 proteins onto gH/gL can significantly affect the binding of other proteins; for example, UL128 increased the binding of both UL130 and UL131 to gH/gL. Direct interactions between gH/UL130, UL130/UL131, gL/UL128, and UL128/UL130 were also observed. The export of gH/gL complexes from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to the Golgi apparatus and cell surface was dramatically increased when all of UL128, UL130, and UL131 were coexpressed with gH/gL (with or without gO expression). Incorporation of gH/gL complexes into the virion envelope requires transport beyond the ER. Thus, we concluded that UL128, UL130, and UL131 must all bind simultaneously onto gH/gL for the production of complexes that can function in entry into epithelial and endothelial cells.

Herpes simplex virus (HSV) spreads rapidly and efficiently within epithelial and neuronal tissues. The HSV glycoprotein heterodimer gE/gI plays a critical role in promoting cell-to-cell spread but does not obviously function during entry of extracellular virus into cells. Thus, gE/gI is an important molecular handle on the poorly understood process of cell-to-cell spread. There was previous evidence that the large extracellular (ET) domains of gE/gI might be important in cell-to-cell spread. First, gE/gI extensively accumulates at cell junctions, consistent with being tethered there. Second, expression of gE/gI in trans interfered with HSV spread between epithelial cells. To directly test whether the gE ET domain was necessary for gE/gI to promote virus spread, a panel of gE mutants with small insertions in the ET domain was constructed. Cell-to-cell spread was reduced when insertions were made within either of two regions, residues 256 to 291 or 348 to 380. There was a strong correlation between loss of cell-to-cell spread function and binding of immunoglobulin. gE ET domain mutants 277, 291, and 348 bound gI, produced mature forms of gE that reached the cell surface, and were incorporated into virions yet produced plaques similar to gE null mutants. Moreover, all three mutants were highly restricted in spread within the corneal epithelium, in the case of mutant 277 to only 4 to 6% of the number of cells compared with wild-type HSV. Therefore, the ET domain of gE is indispensable for efficient cell-to-cell spread. These observations are consistent with our working hypothesis that gE/gI can bind extracellular ligands, so-called gE/gI receptors that are concentrated at epithelial cell junctions. This fits with similarities in structure and function of gE/gI and gD, which is a receptor binding protein.

We have examined the ability of estrogen receptor (ER) to bind and bend DNA fragments containing the Xenopus laevis vitellogenin A2 estrogen response element (ERE), which contains a palindromic, consensus ERE sequence, the X. laevis vitellogenin B1 ERE2, which contains a 1-bp mismatch in the 5'-end of the half-palindrome, and the human pS2 ERE, which contains a 1-bp mismatch in the 3'-end of the half-palindrome. ER binding induced a 65 degrees bend in DNA fragments containing the consensus ERE, the vitellogenin B1 ERE2, or the pS2 ERE. However, ER affinity for the consensus ERE was 2-fold greater than for either the vitellogenin B1 ERE2 or the pS2 ERE. When Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells were transfected with reporter plasmids containing either the consensus ERE, the vitellogenin B1 ERE2, or the pS2 ERE separated from the TATA sequence by 26 helical turns, exposure to 10 nm 17 beta-estradiol increased transcription 12.7-, 2.4-, and 3.8-fold, respectively. Increasing the spacing between the ERE and TATA sequence to three helical turns decreased the ability of the consensus ERE to activate transcription by 55% and increased the ability of the pS2 ERE to activate transcription by 35% but had no significant effect on vitellogenin B1 ERE2 activity. Further increasing the distance between the ERE and TATA sequence to 3.6 helical turns restored the activity of promoters containing the consensus ERE and pS2 ERE but decreased the activity of the promoter containing the relatively weak vitellogenin B1 ERE2. These data support the idea that 1) the affinity of ER for the ERE, 2) the location of an ERE within the promoter, and 3) the magnitude and orientation of DNA bends induced by binding of ER or other proteins are important in transcription activation of estrogen-responsive genes.