The wild-type U L 31, U L 34, and U S 3 proteins localized on nuclear membranes and perinuclear virions; the U S 3 protein was also on cytoplasmic membranes and extranuclear virions. The U L 31 and U L 34 proteins were not detected in extracellular virions. U S 3 deletion caused (i) virion accumulation in nuclear membrane invaginations, (ii) delayed virus production onset, and (iii) reduced peak virus titers. These data support the herpes simplex virus type 1 deenvelopment-reenvelopment model of virion egress and suggest that the U S 3 protein plays an important, but nonessential, role in the egress pathway.Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) virions contain a linear double-stranded DNA genome of approximately 152 kb that is packaged into an icosahedral capsid shell. An amorphous tegument layer surrounds the capsid and is, in turn, surrounded by an envelope composed of a host-derived lipid bilayer studded with viral integral membrane proteins. After the viral genome is replicated and packaged into capsids within the nucleus, assembled nucleocapsids acquire a primary lipid envelope by budding through the inner nuclear membrane (INM) into the space located between the inner and outer leaflets of the nuclear envelope (25,33). Whereas the derivation of the primary envelope from the INM is widely accepted, the route of transit of the nascent virions from the perinuclear space to the extracellular space is more controversial. An overview of the key players in herpesvirus egress and a comparison of the salient features of the two proposed envelopment models have been recently published (8,25).A single-step model of herpesvirus envelopment was proposed for the prototypical alphaherpesvirus HSV-1 (6,18,35,44). This model proposes that enveloped virions move through the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and the Golgi apparatus in transport vesicles with concomitant modification of primary virion glycoproteins. The single-step envelopment model is supported by the observations that (i) enveloped particles within vesicles can be readily detected by electron microscopy and in fracture label studies (35, 44) and (ii) virion egress and virion-associated glycoprotein processing are both inhibited in cells treated with the ionophore monensin (18). On the other hand, neither of these observations can exclude the alternative deenvelopment-reenvelopment model. Such a model is supported by mounting ultrastructural and biochemical evidence (3,10,13,14,30,37,41,46,50) and has been proposed for HSV-1, other alphaherpesviruses such as varicella-zoster virus (VZV) and pseudorabies virus (PrV), and betaherpesviruses such as human cytomegalovirus. In this model, primary envelopment occurs by budding through the INM but the primary envelope surrounding the perinuclear virion is lost, presumably by fusion with the outer lamellae of the nuclear envelope. In a second step, reenvelopment occurs by wrapping of the nucleocapsid and its associated tegument with a lipid bilayer originating from a membranous cytoplasmic organelle bearing viral glycoprotein...

The herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) U L 34 protein is likely a type II membrane protein that localizes within the nuclear membrane and is required for efficient envelopment of progeny virions at the nuclear envelope, whereas the U L 31 gene product of HSV-1 is a nuclear matrix-associated phosphoprotein previously shown to interact with U L 34 protein in HSV-1-infected cell lysates. For these studies, polyclonal antisera directed against purified fusion proteins containing U Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) nucleocapsids, like those of all herpesviruses are assembled in the nucleus and acquire a lipid bilayer envelope by budding through the inner nuclear membrane into the perinuclear space (10). Several viral proteins have been implicated in this initial budding event, including the myristylated U L 11 protein, glycoprotein K, which is necessary for envelopment in nondividing cells, and U L 34 protein (2, 21, 37). Of these, only U L 34 protein has been implicated solely in the initial envelopment step, whereas glycoprotein K and U L 11 also play roles in egress through the cytoplasm towards the extracellular space (2, 21, 37).The U L 34 sequence predicts that the protein is oriented as a type II integral membrane protein with an N-terminal cytoplasmic domain of 247 amino acids and a C-terminal transmembrane domain of 22 amino acids (32,35,37). The type II membrane topology of HSV-2 U L 34 protein has recently been addressed (39). This topology predicts that if the transmembrane domain were anchored in the outer nuclear membrane, the bulk of the protein would lie in the cytoplasm, whereas localization in the inner nuclear membrane would place the bulk of the protein within the nucleoplasm.The exact role of U L 34 protein in the envelopment process remains unclear. One possibility is that U L 34 protein interacts directly with capsids and/or tegument components and the nuclear membrane, thereby mediating wrapping of the capsid in the membrane. Alternatively, U L 34 protein may be responsible for recruiting other viral or cellular factors to the site of envelopment. Both hypotheses predict that U L 34 protein should associate with the nuclear envelope. To date, research on the localization of HSV-1 U L 34 protein and its homologues in other herpesviruses has not yielded consistent results. In baculovirus-transduced cells. HSV-1 U L 34 protein is found at the nuclear envelope and in the cytoplasm (46), whereas in HSV-1-infected cells, U L 34 protein is reportedly detectable at the cell surface (35). HSV-2 U L 34 protein has been reported to localize at the endoplasmic reticulum in transfected and in-* Corresponding author. Mailing address:

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) replication in epithelial and endothelial cells appears to be important in virus spread, disease, and persistence. It has been difficult to study infection of these cell types because HCMV laboratory strains (e.g., AD169 and Towne) have lost their ability to infect cultured epithelial and endothelial cells during extensive propagation in fibroblasts. Clinical strains of HCMV (e.g., TR and FIX) possess a cluster of genes (UL128 to UL150) that are largely mutated in laboratory strains, and recent studies have indicated that these genes facilitate replication in epithelial and endothelial cells. The mechanisms by which these genes promote infection of these two cell types are unclear. We derived an HCMV UL128-to-UL150 deletion mutant from strain TR, TR⌬4, and studied early events in HCMV infection of epithelial and endothelial cells, and the role of genes UL128 to UL150. Analysis of wild-type TR indicated that HCMV enters epithelial and endothelial cells by endocytosis followed by low-pH-dependent fusion, which is different from the pH-independent fusion with the plasma membrane observed with human fibroblasts. TR⌬4 displayed a number of defects in early infection processes. Adsorption and entry of TR⌬4 on epithelial cells were poor compared with those of TR, but these defects could be overcome with higher doses of virus and the use of polyethylene glycol (PEG) to promote fusion between virion and cellular membranes. High multiplicity and PEG treatment did not promote infection of endothelial cells by TR⌬4, yet virus particles were internalized. Together, these data indicate that genes UL128 to UL150 are required for HCMV adsorption and penetration of epithelial cells and to promote some early stage of virus replication, subsequent to virus entry, in endothelial cells.

The entry of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) into biologically relevant epithelial and endothelial cells involves endocytosis followed by low-pH-dependent fusion. This entry pathway is facilitated by the HCMV UL128, UL130, and UL131 proteins, which form one or more complexes with the virion envelope glycoprotein gH/gL. gH/gL/UL128-131 complexes appear to be distinct from the gH/gL/gO complex, which likely facilitates entry into fibroblasts. In order to better understand the assembly and protein-protein interactions of gH/gL/ UL128-131 complexes, we generated HCMV mutants lacking UL128-131 proteins and nonreplicating adenovirus vectors expressing gH, gL, UL128, UL130, and UL131. Our results demonstrate that UL128, UL130, and UL131 can each independently assemble onto gH/gL scaffolds. However, the binding of individual UL128-131 proteins onto gH/gL can significantly affect the binding of other proteins; for example, UL128 increased the binding of both UL130 and UL131 to gH/gL. Direct interactions between gH/UL130, UL130/UL131, gL/UL128, and UL128/UL130 were also observed. The export of gH/gL complexes from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to the Golgi apparatus and cell surface was dramatically increased when all of UL128, UL130, and UL131 were coexpressed with gH/gL (with or without gO expression). Incorporation of gH/gL complexes into the virion envelope requires transport beyond the ER. Thus, we concluded that UL128, UL130, and UL131 must all bind simultaneously onto gH/gL for the production of complexes that can function in entry into epithelial and endothelial cells.

The herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) US3 kinase is likely important for primary envelopment of progeny nucleocapsids since it localizes to the nuclear envelope of infected cells and largely determines the phosphorylation state and localization of the necessary primary envelopment factor, the UL34 protein. In HEp-2 cells, the production of infectious US3 null progeny is delayed and decreased relative to that of the parental strain, HSV-1(F). Furthermore, the US3 kinase affects the morphology of primary envelopment such that in its absence, UL34 protein-containing enveloped virions accumulate within membrane-bound vesicles. These vesicles are most often found along the interior periphery of the nucleus and may be derived from the inner nuclear membrane. Since the US3 and UL34 proteins comprise a kinase-substrate pair, a reasonable hypothesis is that the US3 kinase influences these replication parameters by direct phosphorylation of the UL34 protein. For this report, recombinant viruses were constructed to determine the significance of UL34 protein phosphorylation and US3 catalytic activity on UL34 protein localization, single-step growth, and envelopment morphology in both HEp-2 and Vero cells. The data presented suggest that the significance of UL34 phosphorylation is cell type dependent and that efficient viral morphogenesis requires US3-mediated phosphorylation of an infected cell protein other than UL34.All known herpesviruses assemble progeny nucleocapsids within the nucleus of the host cell and therefore must have a mechanism to transport nucleocapsids across the nuclear envelope. Among members of the herpesvirus family, nuclear egress has been most extensively studied with herpes simplex viruses types 1 and 2 (HSV-1 and -2) and pseudorabies virus (PRV). Data indicate that progeny nucleocapsids can exit the nucleus of the host cell through envelopment at the inner nuclear membrane and subsequent deenvelopment at the outer nuclear membrane (13, 41). Both envelopment and deenvelopment appear to be facilitated by a specific set of virusencoded (and probably host-encoded) proteins. Gene deletion studies indicate that the HSV-1 envelopment-deenvelopment process involves the UL34, UL31, UL20, UL11, and US3 proteins, although the specific functions of these proteins are unknown (2-4, 11, 15, 16, 34, 35, 37). The envelopment-deenvelopment machinery may include other virus-encoded proteins, and no host-encoded factors have been identified at the time of this report.The UL34 gene of HSV-1 (and PRV) encodes a phosphoprotein that is primarily localized to the nuclear envelope of infected cells and is a necessary component of an envelopment complex that also includes the UL31 protein (34,35,37). Localization data and sequence analysis suggest that the UL34 protein is anchored within the inner nuclear membrane by a C-terminal hydrophobic domain, leaving the bulk of the protein exposed to the interior of the nucleus (34, 35). There are at least three non-mutually exclusive ways by which UL34 protein could facilitate nuc...