Primary granulocytic sarcoma (GS) is a rare entity, and even more unusual is the presence of primary GS of the breast. We describe such a case and report on the 19 cases of primary breast GS in the literature. Primary GS presents most commonly in skin and lymph nodes, therefore when it presents in the breast, misdiagnosis is a common problem. Primary breast GS is misdiagnosed most frequently as lymphoma or sarcoma. Histologic testing and immunostains are essential to provide the proper diagnosis. It appears that early initiation of systemic acute myelogenous leukemia (AML)-type chemotherapy is beneficial and may delay or avert the development of AML in bone marrow and blood.

Concerns about adverse effects and random assignment were the most common reasons cited by patients declining trial participation in four community oncology practices in New England. Cost considerations were important for a significant proportion of these patients. Many patients eligible for trial participation were not informed by their provider about the availability of research trials.

Increasing rates of antimicrobial-resistant organisms have focused attention on sink drainage systems as reservoirs for hospital-acquired Gammaproteobacteria colonization and infection. We aimed to assess the quality of evidence for transmission from this reservoir. We searched 8 databases and identified 52 studies implicating sink drainage systems in acute care hospitals as a reservoir for Gammaproteobacterial colonization/infection. We used a causality tool to summarize the quality of evidence. Included studies provided evidence of co-occurrence of contaminated sink drainage systems and colonization/infection, temporal sequencing compatible with sink drainage reservoirs, some steps in potential causal pathways, and relatedness between bacteria from sink drainage systems and patients. Some studies provided convincing evidence of reduced risk of organism acquisition following interventions. No single study provided convincing evidence across all causality domains, and the attributable fraction of infections related to sink drainage systems remains unknown. These results may help to guide conduct and reporting in future studies.

An autoaggression graft-versus-host (GVHD)-like syndrome or engraftment syndrome (ES) presenting with skin rash, fever, and other clinical findings can accompany the early phase of engraftment after autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC)/bone marrow (BM) transplantation. Because ES was suggested to be analogous to GVHD, we have investigated whether ES was associated with any graft-versus-tumor effect that would affect disease progression and survival in breast cancer patients. Eighty-five consecutive patients who received BM/PBSC transplantation for breast cancer (stages II-IV) between July 1991 and July 1997 with minimum 2-year follow-up were studied. Median follow-up time was 892 days (range, 106-2913 days). Thirty-three patients (39%) developed ES. The incidence of relapse/progressive disease for the whole cohort was 61% and was similar in patients who developed ES compared with those who did not. However, there was an increased rate of mortality observed among the patients who had developed ES versus those who had not, although it was statistically not significant, (52% versus 31%, respectively; log rank, P = .08). Increased mortality rates due to disease progression were seen in all patients with ES regardless of their disease stage. In relapsed patients, median survival time after transplantation was 586 days for those with ES versus 847 days for those without ES, and the mortality rate was 85% (17/20) versus 51% (16/31) (P = .008) for those with or without ES, respectively. Visceral (lung, liver, brain, adrenal) or multiple-site relapses were observed in 85% of patients with ES versus 52% without ES (P = .01). In conclusion, whereas there was no effect of ES on relapse rate, a surprisingly significant increase in disease-related mortality rates among relapsed breast cancer patients with ES was found. Thus, patients with ES should be considered for close follow-up and further therapy posttransplantation.

Several patient and tumor factors go into the decision process to determine whether a breast cancer patient is a good candidate for breast-conserving therapy. The patient must be seen by all disciplines before any therapeutic intervention. When used appropriately, breast-conserving therapy produces maximal disease control and improves quality of life in patients with early-stage breast cancer.