No abstract

Skin tests with autologous serum elicit an immediate wheal-and-flare response in about 30-50% of chronic idiopathic urticaria subjects, suggesting that an autoimmune mechanism might be involved in the pathogenesis of this disease. The aim of the present work, involving 68 subjects with chronic idiopathic urticaria, was to distinguish between the serum-positive and serum-negative cases and highlight the clinical differences between the two groups on the basis of the Breneman scale score. We also tried to correlate the finding of a positive response to the autologous serum skin test with other autoimmune diatheses or fully developed autoimmune disorders. Our results did not demonstrate any significant differences between the two groups with regard to mean age, sex distribution, angioedema and mucosal/cutaneous atopy. However, all subjects with positive autologous serum skin test presented more severe clinical features than serum-negative subjects. We found no differences between the two groups in the incidence of autoimmune disease.

In approximately one-third of patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU), autoantibodies against the high-affinity IgE receptor and/ or against IgE can be detected and a wheal-and-flare response can be provoked by the intradermal injection of autologous serum (ASST). In this study we aimed to further characterize the inflammatory response observed in the subgroup of CIU patients with positive ASST and serum-evoked histamine-release in vitro from basophils in comparison with unaffected skin and healthy donors. An immunohistochemical analysis of infiltrating cells (CD4, MPO, EG1, EG2, tryptase), cytokines (IL-4, IL-5, IFN-gamma), chemokines and chemokine receptors (IL-8, CCR3, CXCR3), and adhesion molecules (ICAM-1, VCAM-1, ELAM-1) was performed on seven selected patients (four males and three females; median age: 45 years; range: 22-57) and five healthy donors. Cytokine evaluation was also performed in five psoriatic patients to obtain an additional control. In spontaneous wheals we observed an increased number of CD4+ T lymphocytes when compared with the controls, and an increased number of neutrophils and eosinophils, whereas mast cells did not show a significant variation. A significant expression for IL-4 and IL-5 could only be observed in lesional skin, while IFN-gamma showed a slight expression in the same site. Chemokine receptors CCR3 and CXCR3 did not show a defined polarized response in either lesional or unaffected skin. An increased expression of all cellular adhesion molecules (CAMs) studied was detected in spontaneous wheals. The lack of a significant difference in the expression of tryptase + mast cells, T lymphocytes, IL-8, CXCR3 and CCR3, a few CAMs between the lesional and unaffected skin of CIU patients suggests a wide immunological activation that involves not only lesional tissues, but possibly extends to the whole of the skin's immune system.

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) includes a variety of lupus erythematosus (LE)-specific skin lesions that are subdivided into three categories - chronic CLE (CCLE), subacute CLE (SCLE) and acute CLE (ACLE) - based on clinical morphology, average duration of skin lesions and routine histopathologic examination. This paper describes our personal experience in the management of CLE over the last 30 years, with details on preferential therapeutic options related to clinical, histologic and immunopathologic aspects of each clinical subset of the disease. Effective sunscreening and sun protection are considered the first rule in the management of CLE because of the high degree of photosensitivity of the disease. Antimalarial agents are crucial in the treatment of CLE and are the first-line systemic agents, particularly in discoid LE (DLE) and SCLE. Dapsone is the drug of choice for bullous systemic LE (BSLE) as well as for LE in small dermal vessels (e.g. leukocytoclastic vasculitis). Retinoids, known as second-line drugs for systemic therapy, are sometimes used to treat chronic forms of CLE and are particularly successful in treating hypertrophic LE. Systemic immunosuppressive agents are required to manage the underlying systemic LE disease activity in patients with ACLE. These drugs, especially azathioprine, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide and cyclosporine, together with corticosteroids, constitute third-line systemic therapy of CLE. In our experience, oral prednisone or parenteral 'pulsed' methylprednisolone are useful in exacerbations of disease activity. Thalidomide provides one of the most useful therapeutic alternatives for chronic refractory DLE, although its distribution is limited to a few countries because of the risk of teratogenicity and polyneuropathy. However, medical treatment with local corticosteroids remains the mainstay of CLE treatment, especially for DLE. Patient education regarding the disease is also important in the management of CLE, because it helps relieve undue anxiety and to recruit the patient as an active participant in the treatment regimen.

This study, to the best of our knowledge, represents the first attempt to clarify the effect of ALA-PDT on infiltrating immune cells in condylomata acuminata. Our results appear to confirm previously reported clinical data, suggesting that rapid activation of specific immunity in lesional skin, CD4+ T lymphocytes and dendritic cells could be responsible for healing.