We apply a gender-aware framework to examine the self-leadership strategies men and women early stage high-growth entrepreneurs employ as they develop innovations. Utilizing a matchedpair sample of early stage entrepreneurs operating firms in high-technology business incubators, our results suggest that female and male entrepreneurs have significantly different self-goalsetting and self-cueing behaviors. Results also suggest male entrepreneurs who use stronger goalsetting behaviors increase their intellectual property development to a greater extent than female founders. Further, for female entrepreneurs who use greater self-cueing, the negative relationship realized with intellectual property development is lower than for male entrepreneurs.
Prior research suggests that family firms are more likely to engage in environmentfriendly practices. However, the source of this difference is less clear. This study investigates how environmental innovations and stakeholder pressure tradeoffs (specifically from competitors and government) are simultaneously evaluated within family and nonfamily firms. An experimental rating-based conjoint methodology was used to capture and analyze 1936 firm environmental innovation investment decisions. The results indicate that firms were significantly more likely to invest in an environmental innovation that helped reduce regulatory oversight, and less likely to do so when it leads to a negative reputation among their industry peers. The findings also suggest that while firms will make an environmental innovation investment decisions to keep the government close, they are much more likely to avoid these investments if doing so will negatively impact their reputation among their peers-thus keeping their competitors closer. However, the results also demonstrated that family firms who were highly engaged with their peers were significantly less influenced by the possibility of negative peer reputation repercussions when making investment decisions compared with other firms. This research contributes to the development of a more comprehensive theoretical synthesis among the fields of corporate social responsibility (CSR), family business, and stakeholder theory.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.