Aim
To evaluate the shaping ability of the single‐file XP‐endo Shaper system (XP‐S; FKG Dentaire, La Chaux‐de‐Fonds, Switzerland) employing a different working time and of the multiple‐file ProTaper Next system (Dentsply Sirona, Ballaigues, Switzerland) using micro‐computed tomography (micro‐CT) technology.
Methodology
Twenty long oval‐shaped canals in mandibular incisors were matched anatomically and scanned by micro‐CT (Skyscan 1172; Bruker micro‐CT, Kontich, Belgium). The canals were divided into two groups (n = 10) according to the canal preparation protocol: XP‐endo Shaper (XP‐S) with an extra 45 s of instrumentation and ProTaper Next (PTN X4). The images recorded before and after preparation were evaluated for morphometric measures of volume, surface area, structure model index and untouched walls. The data were compared statistically (Student's t‐test for homogenous variances and Mann–Whitney test) between the two groups (XP‐S and PTN X4) at α = 5%.
Results
Root canal preparation significantly increased all parameters (volume, surface area, structure model index and untouched walls) tested in each group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) in the percentage increase of volume (107.50%–93.13%), surface area (27.74%–29.68%) or untouched canal wall (13.08%–11.74%) between XP‐S and PTN X4, respectively.
Conclusions
The XP‐endo Shaper system (single‐file) with an extra 45 s of instrumentation and the ProTaper Next system (multiple files) had a similar root canal shaping ability. Neither technique was able to fully prepare the long oval‐shaped canals of mandibular incisors.
This study evaluated the shaping ability of XP-endo Shaper and Mtwo systems in long-oval-shaped canals of extracted human mandibular molars using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). Images recorded before and after preparation were evaluated for morphometric measures regarding increase in canal volume, dentin removed, surface area, untouched walls and structure model index (SMI). Data were statistically analysed using the Mann-Whitney test with 5% of significance. On both groups, the root canal preparation significantly increased all analysed parameters (P > 0.05). There was no statistical difference between XP-endo Shaper and Mtwo systems in the increase of the canal volume (30.50%-27.82%), in volume of dentin removed (2.77%-2.40%), in the increase of the canal surface area (11.30%-8.86%), in canal untouched surfaces (9.57%-8.51%) and in the SMI (2.59%-2.68%), respectively. XP-endo Shaper and Mtwo systems showed similar shaping efficiency and were not able to completely prepare the walls of long-oval-shaped canals of extracted human mandibular molars.
Background
This study evaluated the antihyperglycemic, anti–bone‐resorptive, and anti‐inflammatory efficacy of the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus EM1107 in an experimental model of ligature‐induced periodontitis in diabetic rats treated with metformin (Met).
Methods
A total of 114 male Wistar rats was randomly divided into six groups: (1) control, (2) experimental periodontitis (EP), (3) EP + diabetes mellitus (DM), (4) EP + probiotic (Prob), (5) EP + DM + Prob, and (6) EP + DM + Prob + Met. The animals received probiotic gavage during the 30 days of the experiment. DM was induced on the 14th day of the experiment with a single injection of streptozotocin into the penile vein, followed by ligature for EP induction and Met gavage on the 19th day and euthanasia on the 30th day. Heart blood, gingival and periodontal tissue, and hemimaxillae were collected. Biomolecular analysis, immunoenzymatic assays, histomorphology, and microtomographic analysis were performed. Data were statistically analyzed (p < 0.05).
Results
There was a significant reduction in interleukin‐1β (IL‐1β) and tumor necrosis factor‐α (TNF‐α) in the Prob groups (p < 0.05) as well as in blood glucose levels in the Prob and Met groups (p < 0.001). In addition, histomorphological analysis revealed that the Prob groups had a reduction in inflammatory infiltrate. Tartrate‐resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) and microtomographic analyses showed that the EP/DM/Prob/Met group had significantly lower linear and volumetric bone loss than those who had no treatment (p < 0.01). SOD and GPx immunostaining decreased in all groups receiving probiotics.
Conclusion
The findings suggest the immunoinflammatory efficacy of the probiotic L. rhamnosus EM1107 administered either alone or in association with Met in type 1 DM associated with periodontitis.
The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review with meta-analysis on the comparison of self-etching adhesives and etch-and-rinse adhesives with respect to the failure rate of posterior composite resin restorations. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42017078015), following PRISMA recommendations and PICO search strategy. Literature search was performed in the following databases: MEDLINE, ISI Web of Science, LILACS, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Library through July 2021. Six studies from five randomized clinical trials were included in the qualitative synthesis. The funnel plot detected important bias (all studies out of the funnel area). The meta-analysis showed a positive summary Cohen H effect size of 0.406 (95% CI: 0.100; 0.713, p = 0.009), favoring etch-and-rinse adhesives. The total number of failures (including restorations that required replacement and those that did not require replacement) were attributed to either marginal adaptation (five studies) or marginal staining (one study). A very low certainty of the evidence was obtained through GRADE analysis. In conclusion, current available evidence indicates that etch-and rinse adhesives performed better (with a low effect size) than self-etching adhesives in terms of failure rates in posterior composite restorations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.